answersLogoWhite

0

Johnson granted pardon's to people who took an oath of loyalty, No pardons would be available to high Confederate officials and persons owning property valued in excess of $20,000. Not only that but he felt a state need to abolish slavery before it could be readmitted. He also was not a great people person.

A clash between Johnson and congress was inevitable at this point. But eventually congress brewed up a plan(pardon the term) Congress passed the civil right bill in 1866, when President Johnson vetoed a bill to extend the life of the Freedmen's Bureau. Congress wanted to amend it to include protection for the black population. So as you can see congress didn"t really have a plan for reconstruction so they differ very extremely.

sorry for any falsifications i may have made it been a while

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about American Government

How did mercantilism and social political inequalities provoke resentment in American revolution?

Idk 😐


Why did congress put a gag rule in 1835 that and a discussion of slavery?

In 1835, Congress implemented a gag rule to suppress discussion of slavery in the House of Representatives. This measure aimed to prevent the growing tensions over slavery from escalating into heated debates that could disrupt legislative proceedings and provoke conflict between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions. The gag rule was a response to the increasing volume of petitions against slavery, particularly from abolitionists, and reflected the political climate of the time where Congress sought to maintain order and avoid divisive issues. Ultimately, the rule was a temporary attempt to silence a contentious topic that would continue to escalate leading up to the Civil War.


Why did congress put a gag rule in 1835 that ended disscussion of slavery?

Congress implemented the gag rule in 1835 to suppress discussions about slavery in an effort to maintain peace and order within the legislative body. The growing tensions over slavery, particularly with the increasing number of abolitionist petitions, threatened to provoke heated debates and potential conflict among members. The rule aimed to prevent divisive discussions that could disrupt congressional proceedings and maintain the status quo regarding slavery. However, it ultimately faced significant opposition and became a focal point for abolitionist activism.


What type of sentences does Andrew Jackson use in his message to Congress On Indian Removal to make the issue sound important and significant?

In his message to Congress on Indian Removal, Andrew Jackson employs assertive and declarative sentences to convey the urgency and significance of the issue. He uses emphatic language and strong phrases to highlight the necessity of removal for the nation's progress and security. Additionally, Jackson incorporates rhetorical questions to provoke thought and underscore the moral imperatives he associates with the policy. Overall, his sentence structure and choice of words aim to frame Indian removal as a critical and unavoidable decision for the welfare of the country.


Why did Hamilton's financial plan provoke so much opposition?

Farmers and Poor people believed that the national bank would make the rich richer and would not help the poor people progress. It favored the wealthy people.