a strong central government, They were the colonial leaders in the US who wanted a strong central government for the new country. They were opposed by the anti-federalists who wanted to maintain the power of the states, because they felt a strong central government would exert too much control over its citizens' lives.
FALSE! They did not favor a Bill of Rights because they did not think it was necessary for a strong federal government.
The Federalists were in favor of ratifying the Constitution because they wanted a strong central government; the Anti-Federalists were opposed because they supported decentralized power and greater individual and States' rights. The Anti-Federalists in some states had enough power to force the Federalists to compromise by withholding their ratification until the Federalists agree to add the Bill of Rights. Eventually, all thirteen original states ratified the Constitution.
The two major factions were the Federalists and the anti-federalists. The Federalists argued in favor of a strong central government, one that would not have the weaknesses of the old Articles of Confederation, while the anti-federalists were all the people who were afraid that a strong federal government would trample on the freedoms and liberties of the citizens. According to the Federalists, the Constitution granted only a few specific powers to the Federal government, and the people wouldn't need to worry about the Federal government overstepping its authority and interfering with the liberties of the people. The anti-federalists worried that there was nothing in the Constitution to PREVENT the central government from usurping the authority of the people or of the several States. The Federalists compromised by agreeing to a Bill of Rights; specific guarantees that the Federal government could never violate. The anti-federalists agreed, and the Constitution was adopted with the Bill of Rights guaranteeing certain freedoms of the people and strict limits to the power of the Federal government. In the past 220 years, we have seen that the Federalists were terribly wrong, and that the anti-federalists were painfully right. The limits put in place by the Bill of Rights has been trampled, and the freedoms of the people have been usurped, and the "limits" on the powers of the Federal government have been routinely ignored. Senators and Representatives in the Federal government utterly ignore their Constitutional limits, and since the Constitution included no provisions for its own enforcement, there is nothing to stop power-hungry legislators from doing whatever they please.
Federalist
They wanted a strong central government
They wanted a strong central government.
They wanted a strong central government.
The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, wanted a strong national government for the US.
no
It was Hamilton
a strong central government, They were the colonial leaders in the US who wanted a strong central government for the new country. They were opposed by the anti-federalists who wanted to maintain the power of the states, because they felt a strong central government would exert too much control over its citizens' lives.
The issue that divided them was that the federalist were in favor of a strong central government while the anti federalists were opposed to it.
in favor of a strong federal government
In the debate around the ratification of the Constitution in the United States in 1788, those in favor of the Constitution and its concept of a strong centralized government were called Federalists.
Like the other federalists, President George Washington favored a strong central government. He felt one of the main functions of government was to maintain order.
they didnt want a srtong state goverment to take over