The Emperor Diocletian was the one who created the Tetrarchy. The Tetrarchy was the division of the Roman Empire into four parts, with a co-emperors ruling over each quarter. Diocletian also oversaw the last period of persecution against Christians in the Roman Empire.
it means if one has a great history even the hunter cant go against a great history
Cleopatra influenced history by being the tool that Octavian used to turn the Roman people against Antony, thus declaring war (on Cleo) and winning it to attain supreme power.
Emperor Constantine the Great, known for his hallucination-induced battlefield conversion to Christianity, made religious persecution illegal throughout the Roman Empire. This allowed Christianity to flourish and eventually become the dominant religion of western Europe. Because of Constantine, the Catholic Church established itself throughout the Roman world, and stayed there after the Empire fell. Medieval society was completely dominated by the church: cathedrals popped up everywhere, monasteries maintained and recorded history and scientific knowledge, and the Pope had as much influence of most kings. In short, Constantine influenced medieval society by handing the future over to the Christians.
yes its true its in my 7th grade history book
Throughout history, many have endured persecution for their beliefs.
The Emperor Diocletian was the one who created the Tetrarchy. The Tetrarchy was the division of the Roman Empire into four parts, with a co-emperors ruling over each quarter. Diocletian also oversaw the last period of persecution against Christians in the Roman Empire.
W. Denton has written: 'Montenegro' -- subject(s): Accessible book, History 'The Christians of Turkey' -- subject(s): Christianity, Christians, Church history, History, Islam, Persecution, Relations 'Fallacies on the Eastern question' -- subject(s): Eastern question, History
A:It is part of Christian lore that Christians are persecuted and always have been, with numerous martyrs put to death during early Roman times, but this is far from the truth.Any Christians in North Korea could expect to be persecuted by this oppressive Communist regime, but the risks for Buddhists would be far greater. Some persecution of Christians occurs occasionally in Muslim-majority countries of the Middle East, but the official position of Islam is that Christians, as people of the Book, should be free to worship as they please.Certainly, there was occasional and local, unofficial persecution of the early Christians of the Roman Empire, but it is estimated that widespread official persecution of Christian totalled no more than about twelve years, over the course of approximately three centuries. Origen, who, from his experience as well as reading, was intimately acquainted with the history of the Christians, declared that the number of martyrs was not great. Edward Gibbon (The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire), in explaining the tradition of early Roman persecution, says the ecclesiastical writers of the fourth or fifth centuries ascribed to the magistrates of Rome the same degree of implacable and unrelenting zeal which filled their own breasts against the heretics or the idolaters of their own times. Christians of this period needed to justify their own actions in persecuting others, by claiming that persecution of Christians had been far more common in the past.
The persecution of natives is a recurring theme in human history.
History shows that most Roman emperors were tolerant of Christianity. It was Galerius who formalised this by proclaiming the Edict of Toleration, overturning the Great Persecution of Diocletian.Constantine subsequently extended privileges to the Christian Church by the Edict of Milan.AnswerThe Roman emperor Galerius issued the Edict of Toleration that brought an end to the Great Persecution instituted by his predecessor, Diocletian. Strangely, it was Galerius who had pressured Diocletian to undertake the persecution of Christians. Constantine subsequently issued a further edict, the Edict of Milan that gave the Christians positive advantages.
Popes frequently ordered the persecution of Christians outside the Catholic Church, as well as those who claimed to be Catholics but who appeared to dissent from the teachings of the Church. From 1209 until almost 1250, crusading armies poured into the Languedoc region of southern France, on the orders of Pope Innocent III, to persecute the Cathars and destroy their non-Catholic Christianity.
This is for you to decide. Did repression work? Why did Galerius, who was the main instigator of Diocletian's Great Persecution, decreed the end of this persecution seven years later? Why did he do so for peace and security in the empire? Why was it only the Christian religion which was persecuted? What were the benefits of the Romans' policy of tolerance of the religions of the conquered peoples? Note that Christianity was not always persecuted. There were periods of tolerance and periods of persecution.
By definition, Christians act like Christians, but perhaps they do not act as we wish Christians would. The good news is that, regardless of well-publicised accounts of the failings of many Christian leaders in modern times, Christians are undoubtedly more ethical today than they were in earlier times. The history of the Christian Church is replete with murders, theft, forgery, fraud and pseudepigraphical writings, persecution of pagans and Jews, enforced conversions, nepotism and sins of a sexual nature. If the history of Christianity defines how a Christian acts, then modern Christians compare very well to the precedents set for them.
Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecuted them for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.Yes, there was evidence against the Christians, so they were blamed for the fire. However Nero did not persecute them as is hyped up in both religious and secular history. Rather he prosecutedthem for the crime of arson. The evidence against the Christians consisted of eyewitness accounts of them hindering the firefighters and some of them running through the city with torches to spread it.
Christian tradition says that persecution of the Christians began with Emperor Nero in the 60s of the first century. Certainly, he blamed Christians, perhaps unfairly, for the Great Fire of Rome, but there is no evidence for the persecution by him of Christians more generally. It has been pointed out that Acts of the Apostles, written long after the time of Nero, never mentions any persecution of Christians, and that no Christian writing even mentioned Nero as a persecutor until long after the event. Although Nero very likely used the Christians of Rome as scapegoats, this falls short of persecuting them for their religion. Edward Gibbon (The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire) finds circumstantial evidence that Nero never issued any edict requiring the persecution of Christians.Some say that Christians were persecuted under Domitian (81-96 CE), but there is no firm evidence for this. Any persecution carried out would have been local and limited in scope.The first widespread, official persecution of Christians known to have occurred began under Emperor Decius in 249 CE and lasted for about 18 months, apparently without great loss of life.Gibbon suggests that the early Christians created a legend of prolonged and widespread persecution of the Christians in order to justify their cruel treatment of pagans, once they themselves had taken control of the empire.
It did shine as a light through the dark ages and made civilisation progress. For better or worse, it did end paganism, but the persecution was aimed at Christians and not all persecution came from them. it was the cause as such of some religious wars, but its overall message is peace. the conflict between the church and state was there, but simply because the church popes were heretical and the state was mainly supporting the convicted 'heretics' who were actually good Christians.