answersLogoWhite

0

When Nero died, four men vied for control. The empire was in a state of chaos and unrest due to the ineptitude and insufficiency of one self-obsessed leader. If Nero had appointed a successor, much turmoil and many struggles could have been avoided. But, because he was selfish and narcissistic, Nero was afraid to tell someone that they could have control of the entire Roman Empire as soon as he was dead. Of course it is frightening to tell someone this, and we can not blame him for that particular emotion, but he should have had enough courage and devotion to his people to make a personal sacrifice to ensure that they would be safe and cared for after his death. Nero was a superficial man who only cared for his own personal welfare. His incompetence caused pain to many Christians, who always seemed to be Nero's scapegoat, and the majority of the empire was glad when he finally died. The upheaval that occurred after his death is an example of how much trouble he caused to the Roman Empire during his reign. I am thankful that the empire never had to deal with another leader as inept and unstable as Nero. Such a leader can bring a nation to it's knees in a startling short period of time, and if Rome had been forced to endure two of them I doubt it would have been nearly as successful or important in history.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?