Your question is written in such out-of-the-way English that it's hard to know what you are asking. Cubits were used widely in the Middle East in ancient times. A cubit is approx 20 inches, or half a metre, but it varied in different areas.
was a long precess that took 70 days to complete. It was perfomed by people called embalmers.
The pharaohs of ancient Egypt lived life as if they were gods. People treated them with complete worship and respect. No pharaoh ever lacked for any desire or whim.
No, because if they were ancient, we would be too. Get it? Like ancient people lived in ancient times, and it isn't ancient times anymore
Most people in ancient Rome spoke Latin, but some cities that ancient Rome took over spoke their native language. A lot of people in ancient Rome spoke Greece.
Many people believed Aristotle in ancient times.
not every cubit is the same length as the other one and another reason is because some people have no hands so they cant actually measure using cubits
"Complete" predicates have lots of details (adverbs, phrases) about the verb. Simple predicates have simply the verbExample: The dog ran down the street. Simple predicate: ranExample: The dog ran down the street. Complete predicate: ran down the street
Because most people had feet and forearms, that they could measure things with.
was a long precess that took 70 days to complete. It was perfomed by people called embalmers.
The pharaohs of ancient Egypt lived life as if they were gods. People treated them with complete worship and respect. No pharaoh ever lacked for any desire or whim.
In Genesis 6:15 God gave Noah the measurements of the Art. He said the length should be 300 cubits and the with should be 50 cubits. Thus we now know that this makes a perfect ration for boats the with being only 1/6 of its length.
After the decline of the Roman Empire there was a demographic decline and fewer buildings erected and the cubit eventually became the Yard.
There is no specific collective noun for a group of ancient people, in which case a noun suitable for the context of the situation is used; for example a study of ancient people, a settlement of ancient people, a remainder of ancient people, etc.
No, because if they were ancient, we would be too. Get it? Like ancient people lived in ancient times, and it isn't ancient times anymore
There is no specific collective noun for a group of ancient people, in which case a noun suitable for the context of the situation is used; for example a study of ancient people, a settlement of ancient people, a remainder of ancient people, etc.
The Mycenaeans are the people who ruled the ancient Greece.
how did people in ancient greek spend their time