0
This is false. Amulets were worn by many people in ancient times. They were often worn to ward off evil, or sometimes to attract positive energy.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Sumeria was considered to be the first civilization that historians could readily document?
true
All interpretations are equally correct true or false?
False
True or False Roman government used a system called chicks and eggs to keep a balance of power?
was this true or false
Is it true or false that satara was the abode of maratha king?
TRUE
Ancient rome never had a highly delovped system of government true or false?
the answer is false
True or false amulets could only be worn a mummy?
false
Could amulets be worn by corpses true or false?
This is a false statement. Amulets were often worn by people to ward away evil or to bring good luck upon themselves.
Amulets could only be worn by corpses?
Did you mean "amulets" objects worn because it is believed they protect against evil, disease or unhappiness?
true or false could anticholinergics prevent blood clotting?
False
What is the opposite of 'false'?
The opposite could be true, or real, genuine.
Is it true or false according to the bunking actbritish soldiers could stay in any colonists home and expect to be housed and fed?
false
Once it was ratified the constitution could not be changed true or false?
True
when There is no requirement to take action to identify and discipline those responsible for the unauthorized disclosure of Controlled Unclassified Information?
False
Is it true or false that to float in air a blimp could be filled with helium?
False
Are you allowed to open the power supply or monitor?
There is no law preventing you from opening them, at least in the US, but there is not much there to see. It could be very hazardous to do so, however, as there are high voltages present.
What is the opposite of true?
The opposite of true (factual) is false. It might also be unreal or fictional. The opposite of true (direction) could be skewed or angled. The opposite of true (loyal, steadfast) could be disloyal, unfaithful, or fickle.
What is the result of True AND False OR True?
True AND False OR True evaluates to True. IT seems like it does not matter which is evaluated first as: (True AND False) OR True = False OR True = True True AND (False OR True) = True AND True = True But, it does matter as with False AND False OR True: (False AND False) OR True = False OR True = True False AND (False OR True) = False AND True = False and True OR False AND False: (True OR False) AND False = True AND False = False True OR (False AND False) = True OR False = True Evaluated left to right gives a different answer if the operators are reversed (as can be seen above), so AND and OR need an order of evaluation. AND can be replaced by multiply, OR by add, and BODMAS says multiply is evaluated before add; thus AND should be evaluated before OR - the C programming language follows this convention. This makes the original question: True AND False OR True = (True AND False) OR True = False OR True = True
