the Incas did not move from place to place
Basically, there were 3 divisions, but they were not hard-and-fast, (as in a Caste System), people could move between them, but also belong to more than one simultaneously; it was also dependent to a great deal on your social class, wealth, whether you lived in rural or urban society or circles, and especially whether you were a Christian or not: this introduced big changes:- -prostitutes/concubines, -slaves, and -"cow" (a.k.a. mothers / provider of children [sons preferred] ) This last area will doubtless get some angry, but it is true - you must be realistic: it was exactly the same then as it was with the aristocracy in England , where it was common for men to marry someone of their own class (for their money, property, status, position, or whatever) but to have someone else to be the actual mother of your children. This did not stop a couple of centuries ago because it is still going on today, with children born 'the other side of the blanket' being full heirs . In case you think it is not going on today, you just have to look at Prince Charles' and Diana's sons Harry and William; they don't look anything alike. (My [English] wife is quite good at picking paternity.) This same treatment and attitude to women is found in many other cultures. The subservience of women is not restricted , either globally or by time era: it is both widespread and all-pervasive.
because they could and its free.
I've had a couple different answers given to the question. One is that it was originally a designation for "son of Robert", "Hob", and hence, "Hop" being the diminutive expression of it. I've also read that the name originated in Germanic territory as "Hoppe" before its move into Anglo territories. Possibly we were beer makers?
pegasus rockblast attack
Untouchable.
scribeschool
There was potential for ancient Egyptians to move from once social class to another, but it was difficult. To do so, an ancient Egyptian may have served the pharaoh, married someone of higher class, or moved to a higher ranking town or village. Usually though, a person would stay in the same class their whole lifetime.
no it wasn't easy. but it was easier for the Early Moderns (the TUdors etc. ) to move from one class to the other!
Social mobility is the ability of individuals or families to move up or down in the social class hierarchy. This can be influenced by factors such as education, occupation, income, and social connections. Social mobility can vary greatly between societies and is often seen as an indicator of social equality and opportunity.
The ability of a person to enter a different social class within his or her lifetime
the link between social class and social mobility is social class ia an open system which means people are able to move up and down the social hierarchy resulting in acheiving social mobility but people may also move down the social hierarchy resulting in a lower social class this may occur if a person loses their income , wealth or status .
The social class system and caste system in India are both systems of social stratification based on hereditary aspects. However, the caste system is more rigid and hierarchical, with individuals being born into specific castes that determine their social status and occupation, while the social class system is more fluid and allows for some degree of mobility based on individual achievements and wealth. Additionally, the caste system has a religious basis in Hinduism, while the social class system is more influenced by economic factors.
Oscar Wilde was born into an upper-middle-class Irish family. He was well-educated and enjoyed a privileged upbringing, which allowed him to move in elite social circles.
To move up in Aztec society, one could gain status through military achievements, tribute payments, or by excelling in a specialized skill or craft. Marrying into a higher social class or being appointed to a position of power by the ruler could also contribute to social advancement.
move up or down the social ladder based on factors such as education, occupation, and income. It signifies the ability of individuals to improve their social and economic status over time through hard work and opportunity. Social mobility is important for creating a more equitable and just society where everyone has the chance to succeed regardless of their background.
A fixed social class system is one where individuals are born into a specific class and remain in that class throughout their lives. This system restricts social mobility and can perpetuate inequalities based on factors like wealth, education, and occupation. It can limit opportunities for those in lower classes to move up in society.