yes, majority of the aztecs where happy with him.
The Greek/Roman deities had both 'good' and 'bad' sides. They were not perfect. With Cronus, he could be considered 'bad' since he swallowed his children in an attempt to prevent a prophecy from coming true, that a child of his would overthrow him. However, he was also a god of agriculture, and was a ruler during the Golden Age, a time of peace and prosperity.
Hades is not 'bad', nor did he ever become 'bad'. He is the ruler of the Underworld, and God of the Dead. Governing the afterlife does not make someone evil.
Good
yes, until he did something bad... i dunno what and then he wanted his own kingdom so Zues let him be the king of the under worldActually Hades is a god. He became ruler of the underworld by luck of the draw. He and his two brother drew a lot to see who ruled what
yes he is
The Nanda king insulted Chandragupta Maurya by sending him a bowl of food made with bad meat to belittle him, but Chandragupta responded by eating the food in a dignified manner and then using the bowl to kill a lion. This act showcased Chandragupta's strength and determination in seeking revenge against the Nanda dynasty.
How was Hadrian a good or bad ruler
she is the best ruler because she loves Canadian bacon.
he was a good ruler
A good one, he did many things that were of great benefit to the empire
yes, majority of the aztecs where happy with him.
British ruler, japan ruler, German ruler
Akbar is actually a Mughal Emperor who was The ruler in India during the early 1700s. Before Akbar's rule Mughal era was not well known. Akbar was very good with keeping perfect political relations. This ruler singlehandedly almost unfied India in all its multi-ethinicity. However he was still an invader from the west. Hence it is quite ambiguious where he lies on terms of being a good or bad ruler. But in comparison to his grandson aurangazeb who desecrated andd destroyed temples, Akbar was a very good ruler. So yea make your choice.
The Ancient Greek Bad Ruler Was Alexander The Great I Think.
He was neither; as a ruler and conquerer, he did good things but did bad things ei. killed many people when invading and conquering there country.
No, he was a dictator, dictators are not good rulers. ^ | | Not all dictators are BAD people. Some have done well.