It depended on whether you were poor, middle class, or rich.
Most Romans lived in apartment blocks called insulae (singular, insula, island). The poor lived on the upper floors which were the least desirable because of the extra stairs and they were less safe in case of fire and, therefore, were cheaper to rent. The apartments on these floors were small and only had small and overcrowded rooms for sleeping. There was no running water, heating, cooking facilities or toilets. The poor went there only to sleep. During the day they and lived outdoors. They ate outdoors, went to outdoors public toilets, and went to the public baths. The insulae were up to six or seven floors. Despite height restrictions, some reached eight or nine floors. Originally they were built in timber and mud brick, later chap concrete was used. Fires and collapses were a common problem, made worse by the fact that they were often built cheaply by speculators. Fires could spread quickly because the insulae were densely packed, often separated only by alleys. After the Great Fire of Rome (64 AD) Nero ordered that the insulae were to be spaced out, built in brick, and faced by porticos on wide roads. Even so, they remained prone fires and collapses because of poor building quality.
The middle class lived on the lower floors of the insulae which were larger, more expensive and had running water. On the ground floor there were shops and workshops.
The detached houses of the rich were called domus and were divided into the areas. There was a public area centred on an atrium where the social life of the family took place and were guests were received. There was also a private area just for the family members, which was centred on a garden which was called peristyle, which was adopted from the Greeks.
There was a vestibulum (vestibule) which was the main entrance hall which led to a large central, hall (the atrium) which was the focal point of this part of the house. The atrium was open at the centre and was partly surrounded by a portico with high ceilings. It often has sparse furnishing to give a stronger feel of a large place. The rooms around the atrium had an inwardly sloping tiled roof (compluvium) which channelled the rainwater to the impluvium, a shallow rectangular sunken portion in the centre of the atrium which collected it. The water was then drained into an underground cistern which had sand to filter it. The bedrooms of the family were on the sides of the atrium. At the sides of the bottom of the atrium there were the alae (wings) which were open spaces that extended this portion of the atrium to the sides of the house. Their purpose is unknown. At the bottom of the atrium there was the tablinium, which was the study of the head of the household. The side facing the atrium did not have a wall, and at the opposite side there was a passage to the peristyle. Therefore the study acted as a passageway between the atrium and the peristyle parts of the house. The head of the household was able to command the house visually. On both sides of the tablinium there were the fauces, which were like two corridors which also provided passages to the peristyle separate from the tablinium. The Triclinium was the dining room where guests reclined on three couches along three sides of a table to eat. It was at the bottom of the atrium, but separated from it by walls, and next to one of the fauces. It could be accessed either from the bottom of the atrium or the peristyle.
The peristyle (Latin, peristilum) was a garden surrounded by columns which supported a roofed portico which provided shade. It had flowers, shrubs, benches, statues, fountains and a fish pond. There were frescoes on the walls. In this area there was also the culina, the kitchen. It had no chimney; therefore it was filled with smoke. It was a dark and gloomy room. By the kitchen there was also the Posticum. This was the servants' entrance or the access to the servants' quarters. Family members sometimes used it to exit unobserved.
Roman towns were square in layout, most were pagan(before Christ) so that meant a lot of shrines to the gods which really was a lot of buildings that resemble what we see in Washington D. C. today. Columned, marbled buildings with the classic 'Pronaos' porch you see on Greek temples as well. The Romans invented the arch as well as concrete so many buildings had arched arcades such as in the Forum and most buildings were constructed out of brick and covered with marble or limestone carvings.
Roman houses were lavishly decorated, or at least the houses of the wealthy were lavishly decorated. The floors had mosaics, either of a depiction of nature, gladiatorial combat, or even battle scenes such as the famous Alexander mosaic in addition to the more common geometric designs. The walls were either painted or frescoed and rather bright colors were favored. The technique called "tompe l'oeil" was used in order to make the small rooms of a Roman house appear larger.
Roman Villa were decorated with mosacis and wall paintings.Roman villa were very big and only rich Romans could affored them.
They all look different but handmade.
No, most Roman houses were stone floors, however some could afford a mosaic floor, but not carpets.
yes
They looked very large. I do not know what they are called, so do some research.
yes they do but they dont look like our rich looking houses they are VERY old houses!!!!yes they do but they dont look like our rich looking houses they are VERY old houses!!!!yes they do but they dont look like our rich looking houses they are VERY old houses!!!!yes they do but they dont look like our rich looking houses they are VERY old houses!!!!yes they do but they dont look like our rich looking houses they are VERY old houses!!!!yes they do but they dont look like our rich looking houses they are VERY old houses!!!!yes they do but they dont look like our rich looking houses they are VERY old houses!!!!yes they do but they dont look like our rich looking houses they are VERY old houses!!!!yes they do but they dont look like our rich looking houses they are VERY old houses!!!!yes they do but they dont look like our rich looking houses they are VERY old houses!!!!yes they do but they dont look like our rich looking houses they are VERY old houses!!!!yes they do but they dont look like our rich looking houses they are VERY old houses!!!!
they look like old modern houses
Romans bathed in large stone public bath houses. The bath houses contained giant tubs akin to swimming pools.
Like houses
Roman Villa were decorated with mosacis and wall paintings.Roman villa were very big and only rich Romans could affored them.
houses
Usually, the houses look like the houses in U.S.A.
Japanese peoples houses look like houses.
What did the Hopi's houses look like? What did the Hopi's houses look like? i dont know but go on google and type in wigwam or tipi those are the houses they probably live in
they looked like houses today!
What does your house look like
There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.