The ancient Egyptian Pharaohs weren't chosen by a succession like the ones that exist with European royals and many families today. One of the princes would have a power base that made his ascension possible. It is also true that royal officials sometimes overthrown the current dynasty and began their own, this was the case with the family of King Tut for instance.
There are undoubtedly descendants of the ancient Pharaohs alive today and they don't even know it. After all there where about 100 of them, they lived many 1000's of years ago and people still live in the region today. It is a matter of fact that most people today carry the DNA of famous leaders from antiquity. Gangus Khan is said to have about 160 million descendants alive today, all Brits are said to have William the Conqueror in their family tree and most of Europe could probably trace their ancestry to Charlemagne.
If one considers that any Prince of the royal blood could choose to seek to build support for the throne then it is perfectly legitimate for anyone of Egyptian ancestry to try for the throne, if it was restored. As good a candidate as any would be the heir to the last King of Egypt Faud, Mohammad Ali, Prince of Said, who lives today.
In reality no one took Cleopatra's throne. The ancient Egyptian monarchy was ended and Egypt became a Roman province. However the Egyptian priests, in accordance with their philosophy of continuity, proclaimed Octavian/Augustus as their pharaoh although Octavian never took that title.
Many ancient Egyptian gods were identified by a symbol either carried on the head or in the hand, or by some specific manifestation or appearance. In the case of the goddess Astor 3s.t, commonly known today as Isis (the Greek version of her name), her name was written with hieroglyphs that include the side view of a throne; her name probably means "She of the Throne".So she did not "have a throne on her head" - she had the hieroglyph depicting a throne on her head, just as Nephthys had the hieroglyphs of her name on her head, Ma'at had a feather, Serket had a scorpion hieroglyph and so on.
Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).
You are thinking of a portable throne or "palanquin", called qniw in hieroglyphs - not "powered" by servants but carried by them.The same idea (and exactly the same ancient Egyptian word) was also used for portable shrines and images of the gods, which were also carried in processions on festival days.The links below take you to images of these qniw:
Because the pharaoh always had a son or someone to take the throne and the people believed that they we chosen by the gods
they both crapped there pants and sat on their throne and took a vacuum and cleaned it all up.
Prince Harry
Not all Ancient Egyptian Pharoah thrones looked the same, but the stereotypical one is a gold couch
As of September 2021, the third in line of succession to the British throne is Prince George, son of Prince William and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge.
As of January 2010, Her Royal Highness Princess Beatrice of York, daughter of The Duke of York, is 5th in the Line of succession for the English Throne.
In reality no one took Cleopatra's throne. The ancient Egyptian monarchy was ended and Egypt became a Roman province. However the Egyptian priests, in accordance with their philosophy of continuity, proclaimed Octavian/Augustus as their pharaoh although Octavian never took that title.
Prince Henry of Wales (Harry).
Anne, Princess Royal is currently tenth in the line of succession to the British throne.
He married a Roman Catholic, and therefore forfeited his place in the line of succession.
There did not need to be, the gods and goddess of ancient Egypt demonstrated that conscept very well; Isis in reviving Osiris and having a son Horus - Horus in taking the throne of Osiris/Set.
Horus battled Seth in Egyptian mythology and eventually defeated him to take the throne as the rightful ruler. This battle symbolizes the eternal struggle between order (Horus) and chaos (Seth) in Egyptian beliefs.
succession