0
What else can I help you with?
Why do you think the pharaohs had the local leaders report back to the government in Memphis?
Pharaohs likely had local leaders report back to the government in Memphis to maintain centralized control over Egypt's vast territories and ensure the efficient administration of resources. This communication helped monitor local governance, collect taxes, and uphold law and order, thereby reinforcing the pharaoh’s authority. Additionally, it facilitated the flow of information about regional issues, enabling the central government to respond effectively to any challenges or needs within the kingdom.
Who had the most power during the middle kingdom?
The pharaoh had the most power in ancient Egypt. He was like a king, so he ruled Egypt. Hope this answers your question!
Which Persian leader set up local leaders to oververse his empire?
Cyrus the Great. The local leaders were tasked to keep their city/tribe/area under control according to local laws. They were overseen by Persian provincial governors responsible to the king to ensure the local rulers were effective, and to maintain internal and external security: they were also required to collect and remit taxes.
Who is king of the Celtic tribe?
The title of king in Celtic tribes varied by region and time period, as the Celts were not a unified group but a collection of tribes with their own leaders. Prominent figures include Vercingetorix, the chieftain of the Arverni tribe, who famously resisted Roman conquest, and other leaders like Boudica, who led the Iceni against Roman rule. Each tribe often had its own king or chieftain, reflecting local customs and governance. Thus, there isn't a single "king of the Celtic tribe," but rather many leaders across different tribes.
What did Noblemen do in Ancient Egypt?
Nobles ruled the regions of Egypt. They upheld the local laws and kept things in order. They collected the taxes for the pharaoh and for the temples.
Who are local leaders appointed by the Pharaoh in ancient Egypt?
Governors.
Why did local leaders revolt against the pharaohs' government?
Answer:they didn't like the pharaohs' government!!They did not approve of his government ways because of his ways in religion, government, and in the economy. He controlled many things and they did not like his views.
Why did the pharaoh decided how Egypt's affairs should be run at all levels?
the pharaoh made local leaders serve the new government, they continued collecting taxes and serving as judges
Who led a slave revolt against plantation owners in Virginia?
Nat Turner led a slave revolt against plantation owners in Virginia in 1831. He and his followers killed around 60 white people before the rebellion was suppressed by local militia. Turner was captured, tried, and executed for his role in the revolt.
What is the revolt of gumapos in 1661?
The Revolt of Gumapos in 1661 was an uprising in the Philippines, primarily involving the indigenous population of the province of Cavite. It was sparked by grievances against Spanish colonial authorities, including oppressive taxation and forced labor. The rebellion was led by local leaders who sought to resist colonial exploitation, but it was ultimately suppressed by Spanish forces, resulting in severe repercussions for the participants and further entrenchment of colonial rule.
One of the largest slave revolts in American history happened in Louisiana in 1811 how did the revolt leaders organize the slaves?
The leaders of the 1811 Louisiana slave revolt organized the enslaved individuals through a network of communication and shared grievances about their harsh conditions. They utilized secret meetings and messages to rally support among plantations in the region, leveraging existing social ties and communal bonds. Additionally, they may have taken advantage of the local geography to plan coordinated actions and uprisings, demonstrating a level of strategic organization that aimed for a collective uprising against their oppressors. Despite their efforts, the revolt was ultimately suppressed, but it remains a significant moment in the history of resistance against slavery in the United States.
What is the result of maniago's revolt?
Maniago's Revolt, which took place in 1696 in the Friuli region of Italy, was a rebellion against the oppressive taxation and policies of the Habsburg rule. The revolt, led by a local nobleman, Giacomo Maniago, initially achieved some successes, including the capture of key towns. However, it was ultimately suppressed by Habsburg forces, leading to harsh reprisals against the rebels and a reassertion of Habsburg control in the region. The revolt highlighted deep-seated grievances among the local population but did not result in significant long-term changes to governance.
When Ambaristo Revolt begin and end?
The Ambaristo Revolt began in 1896 and ended in 1897. This uprising was part of the broader context of resistance against colonial rule in the Philippines, specifically against Spanish colonial authorities. The revolt was notable for its local leadership and the involvement of various sectors of society in the struggle for independence. Ultimately, it was suppressed by Spanish forces, but it contributed to the growing nationalistic sentiments leading to the Philippine Revolution.
What did the Jews in Judah do that changed Romans' treatment of local people?
Some misguided hotheads, against the advice of the sages, tried futilely to revolt against Roman rule. This brought Roman reprisal upon the entire populace.
What are the plans of silang revolt?
The Silang Revolt, which took place in the Philippines in 1762-1763, was led by Diego Silang, who sought to overthrow Spanish colonial rule in the Ilocos region. The revolt aimed to establish an independent government and promote local autonomy, fueled by resentment against Spanish abuses and heavy taxation. However, after Silang's assassination in 1763, the revolt ultimately failed, leading to a reassertion of Spanish control in the area. The uprising remains significant as an early expression of Filipino nationalism and resistance against colonial oppression.
Why did the people of buster rise in revolt against british rule?
The people of Buster rose in revolt against British rule due to widespread discontent fueled by economic exploitation, political oppression, and cultural disrespect. The imposition of unfair taxes and the erosion of local governance sparked grievances among the populace. Additionally, a growing sense of nationalism and the desire for self-determination motivated the revolt, as the people sought to reclaim their rights and identity. This uprising was part of a broader movement against colonial domination and injustice.
Who was the leader of satara in revolt of 1857?
The leader of the Satara region during the Revolt of 1857 was Pratapsingh Maharaj, the last ruler of the Satara princely state. He played a significant role in the uprising against British rule, rallying support among local forces. His leadership was part of a broader movement across India seeking to challenge British authority and restore local sovereignty. However, the revolt was ultimately suppressed, leading to significant repercussions for the region.
