Because he had a disability that unable him to talk properly and stammer a lot, and could not walk straight because of the imbalance in his brain. According to the novel, "I, Claudius" he was regarded as "Claudius, the Idiot" throughout his life by his family members and peers. However he was no idiot, he only had that disability, everything else about him is normal and his intellect were substantial. they acually thought that he was awsome
I think Hannibal was a quite good leader because not many people could at the age of 26 lead an army which consisted of over 70000 people plus he was mercy less to his enimies. Eventhough he was outnumbered he led his soldiers to victory against the romans.
We would call it a helmet; the Romans would call it a "cassis".We would call it a helmet; the Romans would call it a "cassis".We would call it a helmet; the Romans would call it a "cassis".We would call it a helmet; the Romans would call it a "cassis".We would call it a helmet; the Romans would call it a "cassis".We would call it a helmet; the Romans would call it a "cassis".We would call it a helmet; the Romans would call it a "cassis".We would call it a helmet; the Romans would call it a "cassis".We would call it a helmet; the Romans would call it a "cassis".
The Aztecs would treat their leader with ultimate respect. The leader has the highest authority over the entire village and, how I think, if they disobey they are either severely punished or even killed.
As legend goes, the emperor Claudius (probably Claudius Gothicus) outlawed marriages so that he would have more soldiers. Saint Valentine refused to stop the marriages, and so he was killed. He supposedly healed a blind girl, and wrote a letter to her signed "Your Valentine." Thus, the legend. Another legend states only that he was beaten and beheaded for giving aid to Christians, and for refusing to convert.
The romans would call it the temple of Diana, which is the Roman version of Artemis.
From the date of the "invasion" of Claudius in 43 AD to the present, it would be 1,967 years ago that the Romans invaded Britain. But this is the official date. The Romans had a presence in Britain long before Claudius.
The Romans established Britain as a province with the landing of Claudius in 43 and did not completely withdraw until 426. They would have ruled for 383 years.The Romans established Britain as a province with the landing of Claudius in 43 and did not completely withdraw until 426. They would have ruled for 383 years.The Romans established Britain as a province with the landing of Claudius in 43 and did not completely withdraw until 426. They would have ruled for 383 years.The Romans established Britain as a province with the landing of Claudius in 43 and did not completely withdraw until 426. They would have ruled for 383 years.The Romans established Britain as a province with the landing of Claudius in 43 and did not completely withdraw until 426. They would have ruled for 383 years.The Romans established Britain as a province with the landing of Claudius in 43 and did not completely withdraw until 426. They would have ruled for 383 years.The Romans established Britain as a province with the landing of Claudius in 43 and did not completely withdraw until 426. They would have ruled for 383 years.The Romans established Britain as a province with the landing of Claudius in 43 and did not completely withdraw until 426. They would have ruled for 383 years.The Romans established Britain as a province with the landing of Claudius in 43 and did not completely withdraw until 426. They would have ruled for 383 years.
From the date of the "invasion" of Claudius in 43 AD to the present, it would be 1,967 years ago that the Romans invaded Britain. But this is the official date. The Romans had a presence in Britain long before Claudius.
The Romans. There was a group called the Zealots who wanted to overthrow the Romans, violently if necessary. They hoped that the Messiah would turn out to be a Zealot leader. There were probably also a few people, e.g. certain Pharisees, who hoped he would overthrow the Herodians.
Well, the actual Scene 3 of the play is where Laertes leaves for France.But the question must refer to Act 3 scene 3, the "Prayer Scene." Hamlet gets Claudius alone, but Claudius is praying (without knowing Hamlet is there.) Hamlet decides not to kill Claudius, while Claudius is praying, because he's afraid it would only send Claudius straight to Heaven, and Hamlet doesn't think that would be revenge, instead it would be more like rewarding Claudius.
Steve.Because he has more skills than claudius.
One of the main reasons that the Romans invaded Britain is because their relatively new emperor, Claudius was in danger of being seen as weak, and it was thought that if the Romans get a swift and clean victory under Claudius it would make him more secure in his place as emperor of the Romans.To accomplish this victory they decided that Britain was the easiest target and that they could achieve a quick and easy victory. This is why in 43 AD four Roman legions invaded Britain.
He married to awicked women namedAgrippina who killed him at the end so her son Nero would be the roman emperor.
yes i think so. If the leader was assassinated there would be different requests. Also the
Claudius sends Hamlet to England, but he doesn't get there.
I think the most appropriate would be "Leader".
floor leader i think it well be east to do