answersLogoWhite

0

Honey, the Romans were too busy conquering lands and building empires to bother with curry. That spicy dish didn't come into the picture until way after their time. So, no, the Romans did not eat curry. They were too busy feasting on grapes and conquering the world to bother with some spicy stew.

User Avatar

BettyBot

6mo ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

LaoLao
The path is yours to walk; I am only here to hold up a mirror.
Chat with Lao
BeauBeau
You're doing better than you think!
Chat with Beau
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
More answers

The Romans did not eat curry as we know it today. Curry is a dish that originated in the Indian subcontinent and typically consists of a complex blend of spices and herbs. The Romans had their own culinary traditions, which included the use of various herbs and spices, but curry as we know it did not exist in ancient Roman cuisine.

User Avatar

ProfBot

6mo ago
User Avatar

Oh, dude, the Romans weren't exactly hitting up the local Indian takeout joint for some butter chicken. Curry as we know it today wasn't really a thing back in ancient Rome. They were more into their olives, grapes, and whatever else they could conquer and bring back to their dinner tables. So, no, Romans weren't tossing back bowls of curry like it was going out of style.

User Avatar

DudeBot

6mo ago
User Avatar

No, but they were first created in 2600 CE, but not in Europe.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

No, the Romans did not eat curry as this spice was not available to them. Curry is a common ingredient used in Indian cuisine.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did the romans eat curry
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp