It depends on the government you are talking about. Some may run on the words of a single man, such as a Dictatorship. Some may run with two houses and the input of the people ?ælike the United States.
Since city-states were independent, different city-states could have different political arrangements. Aristotle distinguished several types of such arrangements which he called constitutions:
Monarchy, rule by a king.
Aristocracy (rule by the best/excellent), where a few elite citizens ruled. This government was ruled by members of an aristocracy who considered themselves as the best qualified citizens to govern. It was different from monarchy because the city was governed by a council of men who were considered as qualifying to govern. Being qualified to rule was the key to the concept of aristocracy.
Oligarchy (rule by a few), where power rested with a small number of people. These states were controlled by a few families which passed it down through the generations. Their power may rest of wealth, family alliances, education or military control. With this word Aristotle meant rule by the rich, though the exact term for this is plutocracy. Rule by the few could be derived from other forms of privilege, rather than just wealth. An oligarchic regime could include a wider number of men than aristocracy.
Democracy (rule by the people). all citizens were in charge. Greek democracy was direct, rather than indirect, This means that people voted on laws themselves in the assembly of the people, instead of electing representatives, such as MPs or congressmen, to vote in bodies such as congress, parliament or the modern senate.
Mixed constitution/government was a form of government that was seen as integrating elements of monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. Some issues were voted on by an assembly of the people, some issues by few, such as the senators in Rome, and some issues by a single person. Polybius thought that with this regime the elements of the system checked each other's powers and balanced each other's weaknesses. He also thought that this was what gave Rome her strength.
The Roman empire was an empire before Augustus. It was an empire under the republican form of government. In other words Rome was governed as a republic before Augustus. During and after Augustus the empire was governed by the principate form of government.
Well the answer is Augustus governed well. Well here. I will explain the answer stay alert he wanted to make peace between the poor people and the rich. Also he made to senate available to more people not just the rich. Augustus made the republic into a new form of rule a EMPIRE. That is the answer to this question .
the Roman Empire and the Middle ages were run by priests who wore long black capes.
Yes, the consent of the government was an important idea in Ancient Rome. This idea was taken by many countries, such as the United States, to set up their government.
He was a Roman emperor but he mostly governed the Eastern half of the empire
citystates
Citizen
citystates
To gain land for farming
Athens and Sparta .
Sumerian citystates were originally theocracies.
This impact the city-states because the renaissance were so wealthy in their down city
how were they governed
No, the word governed is not an adverb.This word is actually a verb.
they were governed some how
Italy was governed by archibald Philip primrose. but i don't know "how' it was governed
it was governed horribke thats how it was governed ya stupid twit