Most Roman aqueducts were underground, 0.5 metres to 1 metre below ground. They were flat-bottomed, arch-section conduits with regular accesses to them. Conduits above ground were usually slab-topped. Initially they were made of stone brick. Later concrete, which was waterproof, was used. Water was moved by gravity and therefore the aqueducts had to have a gradient. A low gradient was used to prevent damage.
The conduits could be supported by bridgework when valley has to be crossed or when they were needed to maintain the gradient. They had arches built in stone, brick or cement. When deep valleys had to be crossed the bridges had two or three piers of arches. Then a valley or a depression was too deep or long siphons were used instead. The conduit ended in a tank which fed the water into pipes which run to the lower level of the valley, were supported by a low bridge and ended in a tank lower down which passed the water on to another conduit. This system maintained the desired gradient. The pipes were made of led or, less often, stone or ceramic and sealed with led. They were sometimes reinforced by concrete cases or stone sleeves. The siphons could be vulnerable blockages of blow-out at the lower level where the water pressure was greater and needed careful maintenance. Maintenance was also needed to repair cracks, clear gravel and debris and remove lime scale in areas with hard water which narrowed the passage of water.
The greatest example multi-pier bridge the Pont du Gard, which is part of the aqueduct which supplied Nimes, in southern France. It hasthree tiers of recessed arches with the main piers in line one above the other. The first two tiers have very high and wide arches and a third tier has low and narrow arches. It was built to carry an aqueduct to Nimes in southern France. It reaches a height of 48.8 metres (160 feet). The lower tier is 142 metres (466 feet) long and has six aches with a height of 22metres (72 ft.). The second tier is 242 metres (794 ft.) long and has eleven arches 20 metres (66 ft.) high. The upper tier is 275 metre (902 ft.) long. It originally had 47 arches (only 35 have survived) 7 metres (23 ft.) high. The width of the first pier is 6 metres (20th.), that of the second pier is 4 metres (13 ft.) and that of the third pier is 3 metres (23 ft).
Chat with our AI personalities
Not much is known becuase there are very few archaeological finds and the Greeks did not write about this. One archaeological find, the Tunnel of Eupalinos on the island of Samos, was an underground water conduit.
The Romans used something called an aqueduct to bring in water from lakes to their city. Aqueducts are tubes that go through mountains are elevated above valleys with a very slight angle downward then entire time. The downward slope ensures that the water will flow without the need for any sort of pump.
Aqueducts, roads and some buildings were all things built by the Romans that are still around today. Some aqueducts can and are still used, while many European highways follow the ancient Roman roads. The Colosseum, Pantheon and may of the tombs along the Via Appia are buildings still standing.
Most of the Romans aqueducts were underground conduits. They put the conduits on bridgework when they needed to cross a valley or when they needed to keep it at a gradient to keep the water flowing.
The Romans did not ensure that the water from the aqueducts reached the city. The water did not come from the aqueducts. It came from the sources on the mountains. The aqueducts were what made the water reach the city. They were water conduits which carried the water. An incline was what made the water move. Down the sides of the mountains it was the slope which provided the incline. In flat areas the conduit was placed on bridgework which had a slight incline. Most of the aqueducts were underground conduits.
While the Romans used aqueducts to supply water to their cities, they did not invent them. However they did perfect/or reinvent the syphon and pumps used to control the water.While the Romans used aqueducts to supply water to their cities, they did not invent them. However they did perfect/or reinvent the syphon and pumps used to control the water.While the Romans used aqueducts to supply water to their cities, they did not invent them. However they did perfect/or reinvent the syphon and pumps used to control the water.While the Romans used aqueducts to supply water to their cities, they did not invent them. However they did perfect/or reinvent the syphon and pumps used to control the water.While the Romans used aqueducts to supply water to their cities, they did not invent them. However they did perfect/or reinvent the syphon and pumps used to control the water.While the Romans used aqueducts to supply water to their cities, they did not invent them. However they did perfect/or reinvent the syphon and pumps used to control the water.While the Romans used aqueducts to supply water to their cities, they did not invent them. However they did perfect/or reinvent the syphon and pumps used to control the water.While the Romans used aqueducts to supply water to their cities, they did not invent them. However they did perfect/or reinvent the syphon and pumps used to control the water.While the Romans used aqueducts to supply water to their cities, they did not invent them. However they did perfect/or reinvent the syphon and pumps used to control the water.