0
How did the Romans change their government after 200 years of harsh monarchic rule?
The Roman monarchy was not harsh. All the Roman kings, expert for the last one, who was a tyrant, were benign rulers. This king, Tarquinius Superbus, was deposed in a rebellion. The Romans decided to abolish the monarchy to prevent the return of tyranny. This was the purpose of the Roman Republic. The king was replaced by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other, The short term of office meant that no one could concentrate power in their hands.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Coach
Taiga
Rafa
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why was roman punishment so harsh?
Uncivilised The Romans were uncivilised when it came to living. The rich Romans lived a luxurious life living in a in a big house. They had slaves to accomplish all of there needs. On the other hand, the slaves were all crammed into one room for the night. They were not treating them fairly. The Romans had a great way of entertainment, however, it was considered uncivilized because it threatened some people with possible death. It was called Gladiators. It involved 1 slave fighting against a lion or a similar animal which then ended in the slave dying.
What was it like on crusade?
harsh
Was Pompey a harsh leader?
Yes,Pompey was a harsh leader he beated each soldier for three hours and made them swear that they will not run away from the army.
What were the various views of slavery in the west?
the views were very bad and harsh
Defendants could avoid serving a harsh penalty if they were granted?
if they had gotten protection from the Church
