0
How did the Romans change their government after 200 years of harsh monarchic rule?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
The Roman monarchy was not harsh. All the Roman kings, expert for the last one, who was a tyrant, were benign rulers. This king, Tarquinius Superbus, was deposed in a rebellion. The Romans decided to abolish the monarchy to prevent the return of tyranny. This was the purpose of the Roman Republic. The king was replaced by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other, The short term of office meant that no one could concentrate power in their hands.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe Romans overthrew their kings and established the republican form of government, with two counsuls as the heads of state. This was to avoid a one man rule.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why was roman punishment so harsh?
Uncivilised The Romans were uncivilised when it came to living. The rich Romans lived a luxurious life living in a in a big house. They had slaves to accomplish all of there needs. On the other hand, the slaves were all crammed into one room for the night. They were not treating them fairly. The Romans had a great way of entertainment, however, it was considered uncivilized because it threatened some people with possible death. It was called Gladiators. It involved 1 slave fighting against a lion or a similar animal which then ended in the slave dying.
What was it like on crusade?
harsh
Was Pompey a harsh leader?
Yes,Pompey was a harsh leader he beated each soldier for three hours and made them swear that they will not run away from the army.
What were the various views of slavery in the west?
the views were very bad and harsh
Defendants could avoid serving a harsh penalty if they were granted?
if they had gotten protection from the Church
How did the romans finally change their government afther 200 years of harsh monarchic rule?
The romans made a republic in which the people elected their leaders with no head of the empire
How did the Romans finally change their government 200 years of harsh monarchic rule?
A group of senators revolted and developed a system in which the people elected thier representatives.
How did roman finally change their government after 200 years of harsh monarchic rule?
A group of senators revolted and developed a system in which the people elected their representatives
How did the Romans change government after 200 years of harsh monarchic rules?
The Roman monarchy was not harsh. All the Roman kings, expert for the last one, who was a tyrant, were benign rulers. This king, Tarquinius Superbus, was deposed in a rebellion. The Romans decided to abolish the monarchy to prevent the return of tyranny. This was the purpose of the Roman Republic. The king was replaced by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other, The short term of office meant that no one could concentrate power in their hands.
Why did the Romans finally change their government after 200 years of harsh monartchic rule?
a group of senators revolted and developed a system in which the people elected thir representatives
How did the Romans finally change there government ater 200 years of harsh monarchic rule?
The 244-year period of the Roman monarchy was not a period of harsh Rule. The first six kings were benign rules. It was only the seventh king, Tarquinius Superbus, who was a tyrant. He was deposed by a rebellion. The Romans decided to abolish the monarchy and establish the Republic, whose function was to prevent the return of tyranny. The king was replaced by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other. The short term of office meant that no one could concentrate power in their hands.
What is harsh government?
harsh government is
How did the Romans finally charge there government after 200 of harsh monarchin rule?
They revolted, drove the last king out and established the republic.
How did the Romans finally change their governemnt after 200 years of harsh monarchic rule?
The Roman monachy was not a hostory of 244 years of harsh rule. Only its last king was a tyrant. The Romans overthrew the last Roman king in a rebellion in 509 BC because he was a tyrant. They decided to do away with the monarchy and establish a republic to prevent the return of tyranny. Monarchy became associated with tyranny. They created the Roman Republic, which was headed by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other. The short term of office ensured that no one could concentrate power in his hands and thus become a tyrant. The Romans also swore that they would not let anyone try to become a king. Trying to become a king was the worst possible accusation .In the 5th century BC one man was killed and his house destroyed and in the 4th century BC another man was executed because of accusations of trying to become a king.
How did the Romans finally change there governments after 200 yrs of harsh monarchic rule?
The 244 years of the Roman monarchy were not years of harsh rule. There was harsh rule only with the governance of the last of the Roman kings, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus who was said to have ruled for 26 years and was a tyrant. He was deposed in a rebellion against him. The Romans decided to do away with the monarchy to prevent the return of tyranny. The established the Roman Republic, whose purpose was to prevent this by not allowing a man to concentrate power in his hands. The king was replaced with two annually elected consuls as heads of the Republic. Having two men in charge meant that the two could counterbalance each other and the short term of office ensured to accumulation of power by anyone. The Romans also swore that they would not allow anyone to try to become a king ever again. They associated kingship with tyranny.
Why did the Romans change their government from a monarchy to republic?
After 200 years of harsh rule by kings, the people wanted more of a role in government.
How did the Romans change there government after 200 years of harsh monarch rule?
The period of the monarchy was not a period of harsh rule. All the monarchs but one were benign rulers. It was only the last king who was a tyrant. He was deposed in a rebellion. The Romans decided to abolish the monarchy and create a republic to prevent the return of tyranny . This was the purpose of the republic. The king was replaced by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they cloud counterbalance each other. The short term of office meant that no one could concentrate power in their hands.
