The Roman monarchy was not harsh. All the Roman kings, expert for the last one, who was a tyrant, were benign rulers. This king, Tarquinius Superbus, was deposed in a rebellion. The Romans decided to abolish the monarchy to prevent the return of tyranny. This was the purpose of the Roman Republic. The king was replaced by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other, The short term of office meant that no one could concentrate power in their hands.
Uncivilised The Romans were uncivilised when it came to living. The rich Romans lived a luxurious life living in a in a big house. They had slaves to accomplish all of there needs. On the other hand, the slaves were all crammed into one room for the night. They were not treating them fairly. The Romans had a great way of entertainment, however, it was considered uncivilized because it threatened some people with possible death. It was called Gladiators. It involved 1 slave fighting against a lion or a similar animal which then ended in the slave dying.
harsh
Yes,Pompey was a harsh leader he beated each soldier for three hours and made them swear that they will not run away from the army.
the views were very bad and harsh
if they had gotten protection from the Church
The romans made a republic in which the people elected their leaders with no head of the empire
A group of senators revolted and developed a system in which the people elected thier representatives.
A group of senators revolted and developed a system in which the people elected their representatives
The Roman monarchy was not harsh. All the Roman kings, expert for the last one, who was a tyrant, were benign rulers. This king, Tarquinius Superbus, was deposed in a rebellion. The Romans decided to abolish the monarchy to prevent the return of tyranny. This was the purpose of the Roman Republic. The king was replaced by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other, The short term of office meant that no one could concentrate power in their hands.
a group of senators revolted and developed a system in which the people elected thir representatives
The 244-year period of the Roman monarchy was not a period of harsh Rule. The first six kings were benign rules. It was only the seventh king, Tarquinius Superbus, who was a tyrant. He was deposed by a rebellion. The Romans decided to abolish the monarchy and establish the Republic, whose function was to prevent the return of tyranny. The king was replaced by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other. The short term of office meant that no one could concentrate power in their hands.
They revolted, drove the last king out and established the republic.
harsh government is
The Roman monachy was not a hostory of 244 years of harsh rule. Only its last king was a tyrant. The Romans overthrew the last Roman king in a rebellion in 509 BC because he was a tyrant. They decided to do away with the monarchy and establish a republic to prevent the return of tyranny. Monarchy became associated with tyranny. They created the Roman Republic, which was headed by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they could counterbalance each other. The short term of office ensured that no one could concentrate power in his hands and thus become a tyrant. The Romans also swore that they would not let anyone try to become a king. Trying to become a king was the worst possible accusation .In the 5th century BC one man was killed and his house destroyed and in the 4th century BC another man was executed because of accusations of trying to become a king.
The 244 years of the Roman monarchy were not years of harsh rule. There was harsh rule only with the governance of the last of the Roman kings, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus who was said to have ruled for 26 years and was a tyrant. He was deposed in a rebellion against him. The Romans decided to do away with the monarchy to prevent the return of tyranny. The established the Roman Republic, whose purpose was to prevent this by not allowing a man to concentrate power in his hands. The king was replaced with two annually elected consuls as heads of the Republic. Having two men in charge meant that the two could counterbalance each other and the short term of office ensured to accumulation of power by anyone. The Romans also swore that they would not allow anyone to try to become a king ever again. They associated kingship with tyranny.
After 200 years of harsh rule by kings, the people wanted more of a role in government.
The period of the monarchy was not a period of harsh rule. All the monarchs but one were benign rulers. It was only the last king who was a tyrant. He was deposed in a rebellion. The Romans decided to abolish the monarchy and create a republic to prevent the return of tyranny . This was the purpose of the republic. The king was replaced by two annually elected consuls. Having two men in charge meant that they cloud counterbalance each other. The short term of office meant that no one could concentrate power in their hands.