answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Empire was divided to make it easier to govern and defend. In a pre-mechanical transport age, the distances were too great so it was divided to enable better response times. The real weakening resulted from allowing the Goths to enter and settle on the borders to add their forces to help deter and defend against others. The Goths became increasingly dominant.

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

The government failed to keep order. And violence and tension increased. And the emperor ,Diocletian, dived it himself. He did not do it on purpose. It was just his terrible reforms.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did the division of the Roman Empire make it easy for people to invade it?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about History of Western Civilization

The middle division of the three historical divisions of the roman empire was the?

Republic.1) Pre-Republic2) Republic3) Empire


What was the official animal of the Roman Empire?

Although some people think that the eagle was the official animal of the Roman Empire because it was on the standards of the Roman legions, the Roman Empire DID NOT have an official animal.


Why did Justinian wanted his empire to be like the roman empire?

Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.


Who split the roman empire into two parts in ad 330?

Constantine split the Roman Empire into the Holy Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire. It should be noted however that the emperor Diocletian (284-305 AD ) made this easier as he was the first to divide the empire into two parts, a western and eastern empire to be ruled separately. The emperors who followed Constantine, Julian and Theodosius I, made permanent the division of the Roman Empire into an eastern and western half.


Why were some Romans happy to be conquered by the Huns?

The Huns did not conquer the Roman Empire. They raided the eastern part of the empire three times, tried to invade Gaul but were repelled, and tried to invade to Italy, but had to give up because of a famine in Italy and because the Roman army attacked their homeland. It was said that some Gallo-Romans did not mind the conquests by the Germanic peoples because they were unhappy with the Roman state's oppressive taxation regime.

Related questions

Why did the Roman empire invade people?

They were initially nomadic and moved in from Eurasia to take over land.


Why didn't the Huns invade the eastern Roman Empire?

Because they'd be bum raped by the western Roman Empire


The division of the Roman Empire lead to the formation of what empire?

The Byzantine Empire.


What unusual animals did Carthage use to invade the Roman Empire?

They used elephants


What country did Italy invade in order to regain the new roman Empire?

Greece


How do you think the division of the empire might have hastened Rome's decline?

no the division of the roman empire was so that the empire could be easier to govern and so it wasn't the division but actually the emperors. also that is why the Byzantine empire lasted longer.


Why did The emperor Diocletian divide the Roman Empire into and eastern and western empire?

Diocletian did not divide the Roman Empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.


What two churches formed after the division of the Eastern Roman Empire and the Western Roman Empire?

The Catholic Church in the West and the Orthodox Church in the East


What impact did the division of the emiperors have on rome?

The Roman Empire was never divided.


How did greco roman slavery differ from that of other classical civilizations?

If a roman-Greco empire would invade another civilization the defeated civilization's people would become slaves. Usuall women and children


Who led the Huns on invasions in the eastern half of the rome empire?

It was Attila. He did not actually invade Rome. He carried out three raids on the eastern part of the Roman Empire. He tried to invade Gaul, in the western part of the Roman Empire, but was defeated in a big battle. Finally he invaded Italy, also in the western part of the empire, but had to give the invasion up.


What was Charlemagne empire called?

Charlemagne's empire was called the Empire of the Roman People. This was rather inconvenient, because the East Roman Empire was still operating and WA also called the Empire of the Roman People. So today, historians call Charlemagne's empire the Carolingian Empire and the East Roman Empire of the Middle Ages is called the Byzantine Empire.