Abolishing slavery would have affected the households of the rich and mining. Rich households had many slaves who did domestic and other jobs for them. Miners were slaves because this job was considered a death sentence. It would not have had a significant effect on agricultural production (the mainstay of the economy).
Slaves in antiquity were enslaved war captives. When Rome fought wars of expansion she captured and enslaved many captives. Most of them were bought by the owners of large landed estates to work in their field. However: a) they also employed local seasonal agricultural labourers, b) most of the slaves went to Italy and many areas of the Roman Empire did not have slaves, including Egypt, which was the breadbasket of the empire.
When Rome's imperial expansion stopped, the supply of slaves dwindled as there were no longer war captives. The large landlords came to rely more on local peasants who were hired as labourers or were tenants who paid a rent for their plots of land.
You question cannot be answered by fact because it calls for guesswork and speculation. Slavery was a part of the ancient world and great civilizations were built with contributions of slaves in all aspects of life.
You question cannot be answered by fact because it calls for guesswork and speculation. Slavery was a part of the ancient world and great civilizations were built with contributions of slaves in all aspects of life.
You question cannot be answered by fact because it calls for guesswork and speculation. Slavery was a part of the ancient world and great civilizations were built with contributions of slaves in all aspects of life.
You question cannot be answered by fact because it calls for guesswork and speculation. Slavery was a part of the ancient world and great civilizations were built with contributions of slaves in all aspects of life.
You question cannot be answered by fact because it calls for guesswork and speculation. Slavery was a part of the ancient world and great civilizations were built with contributions of slaves in all aspects of life.
You question cannot be answered by fact because it calls for guesswork and speculation. Slavery was a part of the ancient world and great civilizations were built with contributions of slaves in all aspects of life.
You question cannot be answered by fact because it calls for guesswork and speculation. Slavery was a part of the ancient world and great civilizations were built with contributions of slaves in all aspects of life.
You question cannot be answered by fact because it calls for guesswork and speculation. Slavery was a part of the ancient world and great civilizations were built with contributions of slaves in all aspects of life.
You question cannot be answered by fact because it calls for guesswork and speculation. Slavery was a part of the ancient world and great civilizations were built with contributions of slaves in all aspects of life.
The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.
At its peak power the Roman Empire was the same type of society it had always been. It was a classed based society.
The Jews and the holy roman empire
Slavery never weakened the Roman republic or any other form of government. Do not be misled into thinking that ancient slavery was the same as modern slavery. Every society in the ancient world had a system of slavery which was vital to their culture. The ancients considered slavery a social class or more correctly, a social underclass. The physical strength, mental abilities and expertise in the sciences, such as medicine and architecture helped built the great empires and civilizations. The Romans appreciated the abilities of their slaves and for the most part treated them well with every slave having the opportunity to either buy or be granted freedom if they chose. It is a mistake to judge ancient slavery by our present day standards or to impose our present day mores on the ancients.
i see you
Yes, I think it was
D.Slavery was not determined by race.
slaves had very limited rights and were treated like sub humans.
Roman slavery was not based on race.
Slavery has existed since way before the ancient Greek and Roman times. It is not known when the practice began, but every ancient society had slaves and their economies were dependent on them.
The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.
The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.The heart of Roman society was the family.
No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.No. Roman slavery was based upon birth, not race. Slavery was a class. The ancients, Roman and others, did not discriminate on the basis of skin color or race.
Slavery was central to Roman society because it provided a cheap labor force that allowed the economy to thrive, especially in agriculture and mining. Slaves were seen as property and played a crucial role in sustaining the wealthy elite while allowing free Roman citizens more opportunities for leisure and intellectual pursuits. The institution of slavery was deeply ingrained in Roman society and was accepted as a normal part of everyday life.
NO!!! In western society, slavery has never occurred since Roman times. Western society (Britain, France, Spain and Portugal), have traded in slaves from Africa to America. Hence African -Americans. In a more enlightened and free society, there is no slavery. Great Britain passed the Abolition of Slavery Act in 1833, 30 years before the American Civil War , which ended slavery in the USA.
What impact did slavery have on the deterioration of the Roman economy?
inflation happens when money loses its value and it affected the Roman Empire.