The most accurate answer to your question would be "as long as it took". The time spent on constructing an aqueduct depended upon its length, and type and the terrain it had to cover. The Romans were highly efficient builders and organizers and the military did most of the building of the aqueducts, roads, bridges, etc. As most aqueducts were under ground, it was basically a matter of digging and lining and the project could be finished very quickly. The above ground aqueducts took slightly more time as the arches and supports had to be constructed.
Chat with our AI personalities
Some sections of the Roman aqueducts that were used to bring water to Rome and allow Romans better control of the sea are believed to be around 2000 years old.
The aqueducts were in various sizes, depending on the landscape and distance. However some of them were quite short in stature as they were underground.
Fabric made in Nimes in the south of France."from Nimes"- in French: de Nimes. (the terminal 'es' in French is silent)
The cerebral aqueduct is referred to as the aqueduct of Sylvius
The longest Roman aqueduct was Constantinople.
The Pont du Gard crosses the Gardon River near the village of Vers-Pont-du-Gard near Remoulins, in the Gard département (county) in the Languedoc-Roussillon region of southern France. It was part of a 5 kilometre (31 miles) aqueduct which supplied water to Nimes
She made an aqueduct to transport water to her model village.