The Roman Empire developed a strong centralised state when Augustus, the first emperor, established his own personal ruler and started the period of absolute rule by emperors. The emperors had control over the state and politics, which ensured centralised power.
A strong government
Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.
An empire is not a person. Therefore, the Roman Empire did not invent anything. The Romans invented concrete. Roman concrete was different from modern concrete. It was more fluid and had to be layered by hand. It was just as strong.
The political development of the Holy Roman Empire was characterized by a decentralized structure with a multitude of semi-autonomous territories and a weak central authority, often leading to conflicts among princes and the emperor. In contrast, England and France moved toward more centralized monarchies, where kings consolidated power and established stronger national governments. While England developed a parliamentary system and legal frameworks like the Magna Carta, France saw the rise of absolute monarchy. This divergence resulted in different governance models and political stability in England and France compared to the fragmented nature of the Holy Roman Empire.
Becoming king in England and France was often a more centralized and hereditary process, with clear lines of succession, typically based on family ties and dynastic claims. In contrast, the Holy Roman Empire operated under a more decentralized and elective monarchy, where the emperor was chosen by a group of princes and electors, leading to a more complex and politically negotiated ascension. This difference reflects the varying political structures and feudal systems in each region, with England and France consolidating power within singular monarchies, while the Holy Roman Empire maintained a fragmented authority among various local rulers.
How do i know. its my homework
Justinian I desired to restore the Roman Empire to its former glory, aiming to reclaim lost territories and consolidate imperial power. His ambition was reflected in his military campaigns, which sought to reconquer parts of the Western Roman Empire, including North Africa and Italy. Additionally, he aimed to reform the legal system, culminating in the creation of the "Corpus Juris Civilis," which sought to unify and clarify Roman law. Overall, his vision was to create a strong, centralized empire that reflected the ideals of Roman civilization.
The Eastern Roman Empire survived longer than the Western Roman Empire due to factors such as better economic stability, stronger military defenses, and a more centralized government. The Eastern Empire also had access to wealthier provinces and strategic locations that helped it withstand external threats.
It is necessary to have a strong military force with a large empire.
A strong government
In the more centralized core of the empire, near Rome, the public health standard was much higher than in the outer shell and front lines.
a strong government
The Roman Empire achieved unity and stability primarily through a combination of strong centralized governance, a well-organized military, and an extensive network of roads that facilitated trade and communication. The establishment of institutions like the Pax Romana, which promoted peace and economic prosperity, also played a crucial role. Additionally, the integration of diverse cultures within the empire through Roman citizenship and cultural assimilation fostered a sense of shared identity among its inhabitants. These elements collectively contributed to the cohesion and longevity of the Roman Empire.
Well when the Roman Empire came to the end the only strong place left was Constantinople because it was ruled by Constantine.
Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.Justinian was a Roman emperor and his empire was the Roman empire.
Feudalism evolved as the Roman Empire declined. It was a decentralized system where power and land ownership were based on a hierarchical structure. Lords granted land to vassals in exchange for loyalty and military service, creating a system of obligations and dependencies.
As you may know the Roman Empire became very powerful across the world and spread through parts of Europe, Asia, and Africa. They were very powerful but they didn't have strong leaders that how it led to the fall of the Western Roman Empire.