0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Judy
Ezra
BlakeIt is hard to assess accurately the differences between the lives of men and women on medieval farms. Our understanding of the lives of the medieval peasants has been gradually changing through the years, and the question of the role of the sexes is one area where earlier understanding seems often wrong.
We have had the idea that women did certain things, such as weaving, spinning, sewing, and cooking, and that on the farm it was the women who did lighter work. This idea seems to be partly true, but only partly, in light of later investigations. While it seems true that there were certain jobs, including spinning, that were women's, the separation was more limited than we had imagined.
We do not have really good records of life on farms, but we do, for some places, for work in construction and in cities. Women did many of the same things men did, including working as masons, carpenters, ditch diggers, and so on. There is a record of the construction laborers of a church in France, for example, where the majority of heavy work was done by women.
If we extend this to the farm, we would expect the separation that might put girls in charge of flocks and herds while boys learned to plow, would have been based more on physique and less on sex. Bigger people, with stronger muscles, would have done the plowing, while the smaller would have tended the flocks.
The history of women working has some surprises in it, and we see a change in attitude at the end of the Middle Ages, as women were more and more excluded from the workplace, and a separation of the sexes was more based simply on sex. Again we can see this most easily in towns and cities, where records show women were gradually excluded from membership by more and more guilds. The basis of this was partly the pensions that became available for widows, and to some extent, this was doubtless regarded as a good thing for women at that time.
There is a link below to a related question on medieval women.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How were men treated in the 1600's?
they were treated as wild hogs. they were used to "butcher" the females. Butcher as in give the women sex they deserved.
How did the crusades impact medieval life?
The crusaders brought back new ideas, products, and there was a whole group of trained men returning to Europe. These men would not return to become serfs again,but wanted land and to be treated as free men.
How were women treated in the 1600's?
The 1600s were a time marked by the Scientific Revolution. During this time, women were treated as inferior being who were meant to tend to the house and tend to children. During this time, a centuries-long debate known as the Querreles des Femmes was occurring in which men argued that women were not capable of higher thinking because their skulls were smaller. They also said that because women's hips were wider, they were naturally meant to be mothers and not to be involved in scientific affairs. Overall, women were treated with little dignity and as intellectually inferior to their male counterparts. They were also not aloud to go to the theater and or act on the stage.
Origin of men's vs women's placket?
The placket in women's clothing is set to be convenient for a right-handed person such as a maid assisting the woman to dress. The placket in men's clothing is set to be convenient for a right-handed man to dress himself.
How did rich romans dress differently?
The rich Romans only dressed differently from the poorer ones by the fabric of their clothing. The normal Roman dress was standard--tunic and toga/cloak for men and palla and stola for women. The wealthy were able to afford the expensive fabrics such as linen, cotton, silk and fine wool, while the less wealthy had to settle for coarser woolen clothing.The rich Romans only dressed differently from the poorer ones by the fabric of their clothing. The normal Roman dress was standard--tunic and toga/cloak for men and palla and stola for women. The wealthy were able to afford the expensive fabrics such as linen, cotton, silk and fine wool, while the less wealthy had to settle for coarser woolen clothing.The rich Romans only dressed differently from the poorer ones by the fabric of their clothing. The normal Roman dress was standard--tunic and toga/cloak for men and palla and stola for women. The wealthy were able to afford the expensive fabrics such as linen, cotton, silk and fine wool, while the less wealthy had to settle for coarser woolen clothing.The rich Romans only dressed differently from the poorer ones by the fabric of their clothing. The normal Roman dress was standard--tunic and toga/cloak for men and palla and stola for women. The wealthy were able to afford the expensive fabrics such as linen, cotton, silk and fine wool, while the less wealthy had to settle for coarser woolen clothing.The rich Romans only dressed differently from the poorer ones by the fabric of their clothing. The normal Roman dress was standard--tunic and toga/cloak for men and palla and stola for women. The wealthy were able to afford the expensive fabrics such as linen, cotton, silk and fine wool, while the less wealthy had to settle for coarser woolen clothing.The rich Romans only dressed differently from the poorer ones by the fabric of their clothing. The normal Roman dress was standard--tunic and toga/cloak for men and palla and stola for women. The wealthy were able to afford the expensive fabrics such as linen, cotton, silk and fine wool, while the less wealthy had to settle for coarser woolen clothing.The rich Romans only dressed differently from the poorer ones by the fabric of their clothing. The normal Roman dress was standard--tunic and toga/cloak for men and palla and stola for women. The wealthy were able to afford the expensive fabrics such as linen, cotton, silk and fine wool, while the less wealthy had to settle for coarser woolen clothing.The rich Romans only dressed differently from the poorer ones by the fabric of their clothing. The normal Roman dress was standard--tunic and toga/cloak for men and palla and stola for women. The wealthy were able to afford the expensive fabrics such as linen, cotton, silk and fine wool, while the less wealthy had to settle for coarser woolen clothing.The rich Romans only dressed differently from the poorer ones by the fabric of their clothing. The normal Roman dress was standard--tunic and toga/cloak for men and palla and stola for women. The wealthy were able to afford the expensive fabrics such as linen, cotton, silk and fine wool, while the less wealthy had to settle for coarser woolen clothing.
