0
According to the evidence we have, a Roman auxiliary soldier in the 1st-3rd centuries AD would have worn a mail shirt, carried a large oval shield, and a long sword. Of course, this would have varied quite a bit by period and region, but in general auxiliaries were more lightly equipped than the legions, who wore heaver armor, carried a short sword, a long shield, and two heavy throwing javelins. According to the evidence we have, a Roman auxiliary soldier in the 1st-3rd centuries AD would have worn a mail shirt, carried a large oval shield, and a long sword. Of course, this would have varied quite a bit by period and region, but in general auxiliaries were more lightly equipped than the legions, who wore heaver armor, carried a short sword, a long shield, and two heavy throwing javelins.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Taiga
Rafa
ReneAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What God would a roman soldier pray for protection?
Mars, God of War
What pensions does a roman army have?
Upon retirement a Roman soldier received a cash bonus or land plus all of his accumulated savings.This was not actually a pension as the soldier received his money all at once whereas a pension would be strung out in payments.Upon retirement a Roman soldier received a cash bonus or land plus all of his accumulated savings.This was not actually a pension as the soldier received his money all at once whereas a pension would be strung out in payments.Upon retirement a Roman soldier received a cash bonus or land plus all of his accumulated savings.This was not actually a pension as the soldier received his money all at once whereas a pension would be strung out in payments.Upon retirement a Roman soldier received a cash bonus or land plus all of his accumulated savings.This was not actually a pension as the soldier received his money all at once whereas a pension would be strung out in payments.Upon retirement a Roman soldier received a cash bonus or land plus all of his accumulated savings.This was not actually a pension as the soldier received his money all at once whereas a pension would be strung out in payments.Upon retirement a Roman soldier received a cash bonus or land plus all of his accumulated savings.This was not actually a pension as the soldier received his money all at once whereas a pension would be strung out in payments.Upon retirement a Roman soldier received a cash bonus or land plus all of his accumulated savings.This was not actually a pension as the soldier received his money all at once whereas a pension would be strung out in payments.Upon retirement a Roman soldier received a cash bonus or land plus all of his accumulated savings.This was not actually a pension as the soldier received his money all at once whereas a pension would be strung out in payments.Upon retirement a Roman soldier received a cash bonus or land plus all of his accumulated savings.This was not actually a pension as the soldier received his money all at once whereas a pension would be strung out in payments.
Why were the roman solders woolen tunic wore under instead of over their amour?
Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.Armor is a protective barrier. It is worn on the outside of a uniform. In the case of the Roman soldier the tunic protected his skin from the chaffing of the heavy armor. Besides, if the tunic were worn on the outside of the armor it would be ripped up in every battle and the soldier would have to be constantly buying new tunics.
Why were the Roman Army so successful for there training?
They were highly disciplined, with intelligent and effective commanders, were issued good quality equipment, and were well trained in the use of their equipment and effective combat formations and manoeuvres. The Romans also made a point of learning as much as they could about their enemies prior to engaging them in combat so they could take advantages of the enemies weaknesses and take contingencies against their strengths.Of course this was not always the case, most of the major defeats of the Roman army can be traced to failures of one or more of these factors.
What physical requirements are there for a roman soldier?
The physical requirements for the Roman military were minimal. First of all a soldier had to be a male and if possible six Roman feet tall. He also had to be in reasonably good physical health and mentally sound. The height requirement was often overlooked and if a man were not physically robust, the army would make him so.The physical requirements for the Roman military were minimal. First of all a soldier had to be a male and if possible six Roman feet tall. He also had to be in reasonably good physical health and mentally sound. The height requirement was often overlooked and if a man were not physically robust, the army would make him so.The physical requirements for the Roman military were minimal. First of all a soldier had to be a male and if possible six Roman feet tall. He also had to be in reasonably good physical health and mentally sound. The height requirement was often overlooked and if a man were not physically robust, the army would make him so.The physical requirements for the Roman military were minimal. First of all a soldier had to be a male and if possible six Roman feet tall. He also had to be in reasonably good physical health and mentally sound. The height requirement was often overlooked and if a man were not physically robust, the army would make him so.The physical requirements for the Roman military were minimal. First of all a soldier had to be a male and if possible six Roman feet tall. He also had to be in reasonably good physical health and mentally sound. The height requirement was often overlooked and if a man were not physically robust, the army would make him so.The physical requirements for the Roman military were minimal. First of all a soldier had to be a male and if possible six Roman feet tall. He also had to be in reasonably good physical health and mentally sound. The height requirement was often overlooked and if a man were not physically robust, the army would make him so.The physical requirements for the Roman military were minimal. First of all a soldier had to be a male and if possible six Roman feet tall. He also had to be in reasonably good physical health and mentally sound. The height requirement was often overlooked and if a man were not physically robust, the army would make him so.The physical requirements for the Roman military were minimal. First of all a soldier had to be a male and if possible six Roman feet tall. He also had to be in reasonably good physical health and mentally sound. The height requirement was often overlooked and if a man were not physically robust, the army would make him so.The physical requirements for the Roman military were minimal. First of all a soldier had to be a male and if possible six Roman feet tall. He also had to be in reasonably good physical health and mentally sound. The height requirement was often overlooked and if a man were not physically robust, the army would make him so.
