Tenant Farmers
In a real sense, they were still something of indentured servants. The government purchased land from the owners to give to the newly freed serfs in the form of a collective group. The collective was required to repay the money the government had paid to the landowners over a 49 year period. The individual could not own their own portion of the collective land until they had paid their full share. They were not tied to the land legally any longer; however they lost their ability to own the land if they did not repay their share of the amount owed.
Most serfs were raised by serf parents who trained them to do the jobs they did. There were possibilities for very bright children to be trained in monasteries.
Most serfs lived on manors. These were farming estates that belonged to lords, and whose residents were mostly serfs. The serfs typically lived in a village or hamlet on the manor, in cottages. Some serfs were not agricultural and worked as laborers. They typically lived in cottages in villages or boarding houses in towns.
90% of the population were serfs. They grew the crops, fought the nobility's wars, died by the thousands in war, disease, and accidents.
A serf was a peasant, but not all peasants were serfs.A peasant is usually a farmer. A peasant could be free or not, and though most were doubtless poor, we find references to well-to-do or prosperous peasants. Serfs are peasants legally bound to a lord's land, and were not allowed to move away. Serfs usually had to provide labor in exchange for a place to live and work.
serfs coulndn't be sold or bought. they were higher then slaves in position ----- Serfdom and slavery were two entirely different things. A slave had very few rights, or possibly none. The slave could be bought or sold, and in most systems could be abused in any way the owner saw fit. For example, slaves were often made to row galleys in wars against their own people. A serf did not have the right to move off the manor, but was otherwise mostly free. The serf had to pay rent in some form, depending on custom, which might have meant six days' work each month, a portion of the harvest, or an amount of money equal to the value of a portion of the harvest. But the serf had a right to a place to live, fields to farm, and protection in war or famine. Serfdom was a system in which the serf and the lord had obligations to each other, and what the serf got was not inconsiderable. The Church repeatedly condemned slavery or practices connected to slavery in the Middle Ages, and the result was that the Norman Kings of England banned the practice altogether with laws in 1066 and 1102. Serfdom, however, continued in most of Western Europe until the time of the Black Death in the 1350s, and was never a condemned practice.
tenant farmers Serfdom was abolished in 1861 by Tsar Nicholas I. This was not true abolition, because the Russian government took some land away from the owners and compensated them for it. The former serfs were then responsible to repay the government for the compensation paid. This was commonly done over a 49 year period and the former serfs would not own their own land until the full amount of the debt was repaid. In all practicality, the "freed" serfs were still bound to the land because they had no where else to go to effectively make a living. In that sense, they were very much like the tenant farmers the original answerer states they were.
tenant farmers Serfdom was abolished in 1861 by Tsar Nicholas I. This was not true abolition, because the Russian government took some land away from the owners and compensated them for it. The former serfs were then responsible to repay the government for the compensation paid. This was commonly done over a 49 year period and the former serfs would not own their own land until the full amount of the debt was repaid. In all practicality, the "freed" serfs were still bound to the land because they had no where else to go to effectively make a living. In that sense, they were very much like the tenant farmers the original answerer states they were.
He was responsible for the emancipation of the serfs and other important reforms that modernized and Westernized Russia's institutions.Abolish serfdom
tenant farmers Serfdom was abolished in 1861 by Tsar Nicholas I. This was not true abolition, because the Russian government took some land away from the owners and compensated them for it. The former serfs were then responsible to repay the government for the compensation paid. This was commonly done over a 49 year period and the former serfs would not own their own land until the full amount of the debt was repaid. In all practicality, the "freed" serfs were still bound to the land because they had no where else to go to effectively make a living. In that sense, they were very much like the tenant farmers the original answerer states they were.
In most places the bottom level of the feudal pyramid was occupied by serfs and other laborers. In a few parts of Europe, there were slaves, but slavery was not usually legal, and serfs were not slaves. Serfs were not entirely free, but did have important rights. There is an link below to an article on serfdom.
Serfs are Islamic
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
Most serfs worked on farming estates called manors. Ranches originated in Spain, during the Middle Ages, and were operated by men on horseback who we might call cowboys today, though they also raised sheep. These men were probably not serfs, and there is some question as to whether serfdom was practiced in Spain.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
One of the most terrible things a king in the Middle Ages could do to a serf was to enact harsh punishments and cruel physical abuse. Kings had the power to order the torture, maiming, or even execution of serfs who were perceived as disobedient or who attempted to escape their servitude. The conditions of serfdom were already oppressive, and the brutality inflicted by kings could make it even more unbearable for the serfs.
Serfs were common during the riegn of emperors most significantly Alexander the Great (19th Century Russian emporer, father to failed 20th Century Emporer Alexander his son) the last true Emporer of Russia. Serfs did what they were told or else. This may have contributed to the establishment of a Communist State werein the Serfs replaced poverty under an Emporer with a peoples democracy (that was not much better) founded on markist principle of"From each according to his ability to each according to their needs".Sounds good until you find yourself continuously on the ability end.Serfs are Slaves from a time gone by and are known now by other titles.Bailout anyone.Environment typically Agrarian old world
The lowest group in most medieval societies were the serfs, who were bound to the manors on which they lived, did not own land, and were peasant farmers. Serfdom disappeared in many places in the Middle Ages, partly because the serfs wanted to run their own lives, and partly because the lords of manors did not want the responsibility of taking care of the serfs on their land. In some places there were slaves, who were lower than serfs. Slavery gradually disappeared during the Middle Ages in most places. In England, it became illegal at the beginning of the 12th century. People who had left their manors and managed to become free were often made destitute because of unavailability of jobs, famine, war, and so on. These people were probably the poorest of all because no one cared for them except out of charity.