The society was corrupt, its leaders simply incompetent, the army was composed of generations of Germanic mercenaries, most of Rome's territories had been lost, and the empire finally succumbed to seven waves of invasion which left it precariously weak by the 470s. In 476, the Barbarian King Odoacer forced the last emperor, Romulus Augustus to abdicate from the throne, this marked the end of the "Roman" Empire. The Eastern Roman Empire was then called the Byzantine Empire from that point onward.
You need to research the topic so that you can decide what was not a factor for yourself.
It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.
In layman's terms: After the First World War Germany got a really raw deal this was a contributing factor to the Second World War, so the U.S was afraid of a third one and they gave western Europe loans to ensure stability and prosperity. Also they were afraid that weak, poor European countries would be more susceptible to communist revolution.
The enormous expenditure on the pay for soldiers and commanders and on military provisions of an massive army of some 40.000 was the main cause for the increase that created hardship in the Roman empire. The state could barely manage to finance this. This led to an oppressive tax regime. The expansion of the imperial bureaucracy, which became bloated, by the emperor Diocletian was also another important factor.
This is an assumption, not a fact. Contrarily, high inflation towards the end of the empire is arguably the sign, and not the cause, of the weakening empire. See the reasons for the inflation, at the link below.
No, it was not. Charlemagne died about 340 years after the fall of the western part o the Roman Empire.
Yes, it is a contributing factor.
The primary factor contributing to the rise in sea levels worldwide is the melting of polar ice caps and glaciers due to global warming caused by human activities.
According to the coroner, she died from drowning in the bathtub of the hotel, but also listed as a contributing factor was heart disease caused by cocaine abuse over the years.
According to the coroner, she died from drowning in the bathtub of the hotel, but also listed as a contributing factor was heart disease caused by cocaine abuse over the years.
You need to research the topic so that you can decide what was not a factor for yourself.
My balls
how important is the experience of young children as a contributing factor of laer development
The largest factor is the amount of labor.
Ringing in the ears is associated with some degree of hearing loss in over 90% of patients. Loud noise (acoustics) definitely is a contributing factor.
The decline of the Spanish Empire in the 1600s was primarily caused by economic problems, including heavy debt from wars and overspending, as well as the loss of valuable colonies and trade routes to other European powers.
Yes, pollution is a contributing factor. There are many types of pollution, all of which cause degradation of the natural environment.