answersLogoWhite

0

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve
ProfessorProfessor
I will give you the most educated answer.
Chat with Professor
RossRoss
Every question is just a happy little opportunity.
Chat with Ross
More answers

Wealthy landowners in ancient Rome were known as partricians.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
User Avatar

The class of wealthy landowners in the early Republic of Roman society were The patricians

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
User Avatar

Aristocratic landowners were called patricians. The poor, common, people of Rome were called plebians.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago
User Avatar

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

It was the patricians or patriciate.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
User Avatar

Were the patricians.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
User Avatar

Patricians

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago
User Avatar

latifunda

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which is the rich land owning class of Romans?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about History of Western Civilization

Where did rich Romans live and sleep?

Rich Romans lived in their houses and slept in their beds.


Why are patricians rich?

Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.


What do poor Romans and rich Romans have in common?

They have citizenship, which places them in a privileged relationship with non-citizens.


When did the Romans live in 55-57?

IF they were rich they would live outside the citites.


Who came after the Celts?

In Britain the rich Romans came and took over the Celt's.