answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Wealthy landowners in ancient Rome were known as partricians.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

The class of wealthy landowners in the early Republic of Roman society were The patricians

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

Aristocratic landowners were called patricians. The poor, common, people of Rome were called plebians.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

It was the patricians or patriciate.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

Were the patricians.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Patricians

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

latifunda

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which is the rich land owning class of Romans?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about History of Western Civilization

Where did rich Romans live and sleep?

Rich Romans lived in their houses and slept in their beds.


Why are patricians rich?

Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.


What do poor Romans and rich Romans have in common?

They have citizenship, which places them in a privileged relationship with non-citizens.


What type of Romans could serve in a government?

rich people could serve


When did the Romans live in 55-57?

IF they were rich they would live outside the citites.

Related questions

Why did rich Romans want villas?

They were important t the upper class ancient Romans because that is were they lived.


What people were the most powerful prior to the civil war?

The rich white land-owning males


How was the voting in the colonies related to the requirements about owning land?

Only white men who owned a certain amount of land, which meant that they were rich, could vote in the colonies.


Did the poor Romans have butter?

No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.


What are some of the advantages of living in ancient Rome?

What are some advantages of living in ancient rome


How were Romans rich?

very rich


Which class of people was angry over losing land to the rich in the 100s BC?

Farmers


Where did rich Romans live and sleep?

Rich Romans lived in their houses and slept in their beds.


How did ancient Romans traded by land sea and river?

The Romans sailed the seas on ships and the rivers on boats. They travelled overland on foot, on donkeys or in wagons. The rich travelled on horses.


How rich and poor Romans lived.?

rich Romans lived in big houses or beautiful palaces


How did rich and poor Romans lived?

rich Romans lived in big houses or beautiful palaces


Which class of people was angry over losing land to the rich in the 100's BC?

Farmers