answersLogoWhite

0

There was no Roman Empire in 200 BC, in those days Rome was a Republic ruled by the Senate

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

JordanJordan
Looking for a career mentor? I've seen my fair share of shake-ups.
Chat with Jordan
BeauBeau
You're doing better than you think!
Chat with Beau
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
More answers

The answer is Scipio and Rome's leader in 133 BC was Hannibal

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who was the leader of Rome in 133 BC?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about History of Western Civilization

What did they call their leader in ancient rome?

During the 144 years of the Roman monarchy (753-509 BC) the king was the leader of Rome. During the 482 years if the Roman Republic (509-27 BC) two annually elected consuls were the heads of Rome and her army In the following 503 years (27 BC-476 AD) Rome was ruled by emperors.


Established as the form of government in rome around 509 bc?

At about 510 BC Rome established the republic as their government.At about 510 BC Rome established the republic as their government.At about 510 BC Rome established the republic as their government.At about 510 BC Rome established the republic as their government.At about 510 BC Rome established the republic as their government.At about 510 BC Rome established the republic as their government.At about 510 BC Rome established the republic as their government.At about 510 BC Rome established the republic as their government.At about 510 BC Rome established the republic as their government.


Was Rome a empire in 133 BC?

No. The term "Empire" only applies to Rome between the periods 44BC - 1453 AD. It was, however, a republic, for 500 years before 44BC, and did control several territories during that time, with an area of 1,950,000 km2 (752,899 sq mi). If you look up the definition of "empire" in the dictionary, you will find that Rome actually was an empire in 133 BC. There is a mistaken belief that the empire began with Augustus. Historians never refer to the reign of Augustus and those after him as the empire, they use the proper name, the principate.


When did barbarians first attack rome?

The Gauls, who were considered the barbarians of the time, were the first to sack Rome in 390 BC.The Gauls, who were considered the barbarians of the time, were the first to sack Rome in 390 BC.The Gauls, who were considered the barbarians of the time, were the first to sack Rome in 390 BC.The Gauls, who were considered the barbarians of the time, were the first to sack Rome in 390 BC.The Gauls, who were considered the barbarians of the time, were the first to sack Rome in 390 BC.The Gauls, who were considered the barbarians of the time, were the first to sack Rome in 390 BC.The Gauls, who were considered the barbarians of the time, were the first to sack Rome in 390 BC.The Gauls, who were considered the barbarians of the time, were the first to sack Rome in 390 BC.The Gauls, who were considered the barbarians of the time, were the first to sack Rome in 390 BC.


How many provinces of Rome were there in 133 BC?

The number of provinces of the Roman Empire varied over time. Under the Republic there number of provinces reached 15. Under the period of the Principate (from the rule of Augustus to that of Numerian, 27 BC to 284 AD) the number had reached 39. Emperor Diocletian (ruled 285-305 AD) increased the number to 122 by subdividing the existing provinces. Constantine the great (ruled 324 to 337 AD) reduced thenumberslightly. There were also changes in the structure and number of the provinces in the late Empire.