More answers

Zero wasn't invented yet. It was invented in the Middle East

Another answer: There was no need for a zero in their system. We have 9 numbers plus the zero symbol. We add a zero on to the end of a number to convert it to tens and two zeros to convert it to hundreds and so on. The Romans simply had different symbols for tens and hundreds. For example we would write 1, 10, 20, 40, 50, 100 and 200 but the same numbers as Roman numerals would be I, X, XX, XL, L, C and CC, done quite simply with no need for a zero. In the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, began to used the symbol N to represent zero (from the Latin Nullae meaning nothing).

Q: Why did the Romans not use a zero?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about History of Western Civilization

The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.

i do not no

The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.

Stone and turf.

Yes they had most of the tools and implements we use today

Related questions

Yes the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N but there was no need to use it because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self explanatory. For example to write out 501 we need to include a zero to represent its real value but the equivalent of 501 in Roman numerals is DI which does not require a zero symbol.

The Romans

THE ROMANS HAVE DESIGNED THE NUBER ZERO .................. STUPID IDIOT No.1

The Romans did not have the concept of zero-- there is no Roman numeral for zero. This lack made it virtually impossible to do arithmetic with Roman numerals and that is why we use Arabic numerals nowadays.

The number zero is needed in the Hindu-Arabic numeral system because as for example it tells us that there is a difference between 207 and 27 but in the Roman numeral system a zero number is not needed because we automatically know that there is a difference between CCVII and XXVII. In fact the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N and its Latin word is 'nihil'

The number zero is needed in the Hindu-Arabic numeral system because as for example it tells us that there is a difference between 207 and 27 but in the Roman numeral system a zero number is not needed because we automatically know that there is a difference between CCVII and XXVII. In fact the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N and its Latin word is 'nihil'

The Romans did not use place value as they had no numeral for zero. In the Hindu/Arabic system, which most of the world uses, one followed by zero becomes ten and if an additional zero is added it become a hundred. In the Roman system of numerals 1 = I and 10 = X and 100 = C. So, as you can see there are no place values just different numerals for different values.

Because the Romans didn't understand the concept of the number "Zero". If there is nothing, then why bother writing it down? The Arabs, whose sumeric system we use, were very advanced in math and came up with the concept that the number zero can be used in equations and calculations. So we use that system instead of the Roman system. ...that and the Romans didn't have decimals.

The Romans invented a method for writing numbers but so did other cultures. The Indians developed a numbering system that included the zero. There was no zero in the Roman system.

1 Million me kitane zero

Romans did not understand the concept of a zero.

No! Nor did the Romans figure the concept of negative numbers.