They did not need a zero. The number zero was invented by the Indians (not sure when). But when Romans wanted to write 10it was just X. No need for a zero
Also, they did not recognize the polarity of magnetism or the need to identify neutrality with a "zero" placeholder.
Chat with our AI personalities
Zero wasn't invented yet. It was invented in the Middle East
Another answer: There was no need for a zero in their system. We have 9 numbers plus the zero symbol. We add a zero on to the end of a number to convert it to tens and two zeros to convert it to hundreds and so on. The Romans simply had different symbols for tens and hundreds. For example we would write 1, 10, 20, 40, 50, 100 and 200 but the same numbers as Roman numerals would be I, X, XX, XL, L, C and CC, done quite simply with no need for a zero. In the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, began to used the symbol N to represent zero (from the Latin Nullae meaning nothing).
The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.The Romans perfected concrete for use in building materials.
i do not no
Stone and turf.
The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.The most significant contribution of the Romans to architecture had to be the dome. They were able to do this by the judicious use of concrete.
Yes they had most of the tools and implements we use today