Law and Order was very harsh in Medieval England. It was believed
that people would only learn how to behave properly if they feared
what would happen to them if they broke the law. Even the
'smallest' offences had serious punishments.
Uncivilised The Romans were uncivilised when it came to living. The rich Romans lived a luxurious life living in a in a big house. They had slaves to accomplish all of there needs. On the other hand, the slaves were all crammed into one room for the night. They were not treating them fairly. The Romans had a great way of entertainment, however, it was considered uncivilized because it threatened some people with possible death. It was called Gladiators. It involved 1 slave fighting against a lion or a similar animal which then ended in the slave dying.
Judgments and punishments varied by place and status. A vast majority of judgments were handed out by the assize - a group of knights traveling to various towns and cities to hold court, hear claims, and judge and punish those who broke the law. Because it was impossible for the king to hear every case, the knights, landholders he appointed and trusted, were assigned to judge people in his stead. The king's court primarily dealt with very high ranking nobles and foreign heads of state. The knights were wealthy land owners and while some were fair and honest, many times judgments could be skewed and fines or punishments did not fit the crime. This is why the Provisions of Oxford and later the Magna Carta required a jury of peers - a jury equal in rank and standing to the person accused. Larger towns might have a seneschal or autocrat who could also hand out judgments and punishments but if something happened that directly involved the seneschal or the high ranking person of the town, many times they would have to wait for the assize to make the circuit.
My theory is good and bad. I also think it was more for the bad but its an opinion.
I think it is because he felt bad that he had killed so many people with his inventin of dynamite. Is this true? If not, then why?
After the slaughter of the Iceni in the final battle, the Romans treated them very harshly as punishment and revenge for their atrocities. In time, the punishments wore off, a new governor was appointed and the Iceni were absorbed into the Roman population.
She isn't bad but sometimes she gives harsh punishments.
As bad as you could imagine. Including whipping, branding, and mutilation.
rewards encourage them to have good behavior. punishments help correct their bad behavior.
Type your answer here..bad ones got it
it voted on things like who would be killed for bad behaviour and punishments
because no one cares
In antiquity it was common for punishments to be harsh.
Late homework should be punished by bad grades. The actual points should be up to the teacher.
It was a time of practically depression for the slaves. Their 'Masters' would use horrible punishments for those attempting escape, many of these punishments would be violent, painful and inhuman, so many, avoided these punishments by avoiding escape.
Bad eggs are a mystery to Pokemon games.People think bad eggs are punishments programmed to Pokemon games that are hacked with games cheats,but this is unknown.You can get one by hacking too much. The bad egg will hatch.. and it will hatch into... BadEgg
The distributor of rewards and punishments is Nemesis, who was a Greek goddess and the daughter of Jupiter (Zeus) and Ananke (Necessity).She was known for ensuring that people received what they deserved, whether good or bad, based on their actions.
The main problem of the poor was survival. Most of them were unemployed or underemployed. They relied of a initially subsidised and then free grain dole distributed by the state. Another problem was unfairness. Most of the Roman punishments were corporal punishments and death sentences. Most of these were meted out on the poor. The rich usually got away with a fine or house arrest, except for cases of treason.