I'm assuming the question wishes to compare the People's Liberation Army (PLA) of the People's Republic of China to that of the Indian Army (IA).
Quantitatively, the PLA is roughly 80% bigger than the IA in terms of active personnel, but is about the same size when reserve and paramillitary forces are included.
In terms of hardware, the PLA slightly outnumbers the IA in terms of current-generation tanks (in both cases, mostly Russian T-90 clones and derivatives), but has about double the number of older previous-generation tanks (T-72 and similar). The same goes for most other armored vehicles. The PLA seems to have a larger compliment of non-nuclear rocket launchers, while the IA maintains a larger traditional artillery section.
Both maintain a substantial air force, with the PLA being maybe 25% bigger, but the IA being equipped with a larger percentage of significantly more modern aircraft. The PLA, however, possesses a much larger SAM and air-defense section than the IA, about three times the size.
On the base numbers, the PLA is notably stronger than the IA, but not overwhelmingly so. The big difference is in structure and quality. Discounting both the reserve and paramilitary formations of both sides (neither of which are useful in anything other than true emergency defense-of-the-homeland scenarios), both are at rough parity. The IA has fought at least 3 major wars and several minor ones in the last half-century, while the PLA has fought exactly once (in the Korean War). The IA looks much closer to a "Western" standard army in terms of training, organization, and doctrine - though, frankly, it's not anywhere near the standard of the top-rate militaries such as the US and UK. The PLA, on the other hand, much resembles the old Soviet army in structure and doctrine.
Frankly, neither the PLA nor the IA is capable of force projection. Both are fully capable of fighting major border wars, however, and given the fact that both countries possess substantial nuclear arsenals, and the relatively poor relationship between the two, there is serious concern over possible conflicts. Both countries also maintain substantial (though small) elite forces which are very high quality and capable of any special forces-style attacks and operations.
we respect indian army because they protect from enemy.
strength of Indian army
The exact salary of sub-lieutenant in Indian army is INR 6000.
to many to count
When the Chinese military (usually the army) takes over a city or country (nation).
Its true that Chinese army is almost twice than that of Indian Army but if you listen a song sung by Lata Mangeshkar "ae mere watan ke logo" in that she mentions that an Individual soldier of India had killed almost 10 soldiers of Chinese Army to maintain its own territorial soverignity in the past "Dus Dus ko ek ne mara" The conclusion of the story is Indian Army have that ability to destroy & reply back if any of the power attacks.. that's the Josh of an Indian Army!! It is the Best Army in the World! So be careful Chinese forces don't ever try or think to attack on India! Jai Hind..!
equal to the chinese military of the 1970s
There was some rock throwing between the Chinese army and Indian army on the border in September of 2017.
The Chinese Army The Indian Railway The British National Health Service
Merely to gain more territory and to gain more resources for its war effort. However, the Indian army had recently defeated the Chinese army and the Japanese army had trouble defeating the Chinese army as is, so... they really weren't able to get very far into India.
Indian army because they have second powerfulest army in the world
whar are the qualification for Indian army ?
Without either side using their nuclear weapons, and with the Indian Army resisting a Chinese Army invasion, I think India would have a good chance of winning. If it were the other way around China would win, but India would have little reason to invade China.
Punjab Army was created in 1801.
K.M.Cariappa
There is no Indian army.
who is the brigadier of indian army at present