Most often the answer is no; it is the general's choice. Countries usually will not risk the life of an important figure, such as an general. However, sometimes, if all else fails, the general may go and fight. A general has greater experience, due to his high rank, so they tend to be in superior physical and mental condition, and well able to handle the rigours of a battle.
Yes, many do. The most notable one to me was Gen Norman (Dutch) Cota. As Assistant Division Commander of the US 29th Infantry , Cota landed with his men on the second wave to hit Omaha Beach on D-Day. Cota was one of the highest-ranking officers on the beach that day. He is famous for personally rallying and encouraging the shell-shocked, pinned-down survivors and opening one of the first vehicle exits off the beach.
they fight
Yes, Black Soldiers did fight in World War 1
Plenty of US Servicemen of Irish descent fought in the war, but Ireland did not fight in the Vietnam War.
they fought in houses
many soldiers were afraid of the puinshments if they didnt fight, as it was a law. also due to patriotism, an the soldiers wanted their country 2 be successful in the war, many were also motivated by companionship etc
49 000 soldiers were sent to fight in the Vietnam war.
they fight
Yes, Black Soldiers did fight in World War 1
sarah's dad kills him
In WW1 The lions were the soldiers and the donkeys were the generals . It is believed that the generals led the lions (soldiers) to their death
fight
training
with war.
No. That is war.
Yes, soldiers fought in the Civil War. Sadly, that is the fact of war.
fight
There have been many instances of battles in history where generals have retreated or abandoned their armies in battle.