answersLogoWhite

0

The professional historian must keep in mind the politics of war. War is the obtaining of a political goal by other than political means.

Casualty estimations will almost ALWAYS have some political influence.

Advocates of the use of the "bomb" (Atomic Bomb) will estimate higher casualties to justify the use of such weapon(s).

Or...in the absence of proof; estimations can truly be "estimates." But politics will not be totally absent.

Japanese casualties have been quoted in history books to be as high as over one million casualties had an invasion taken place. Allied (US primarily) casualties had been estimated from 500,000 to a million casualties, depending upon who was speaking.

Had an invasion taken place, another year or two may have been needed to bring WW2 to a close.

One factor, would not be an estimation; if such an invasion had taken place, many people alive today in the United States (and Japan), wouldn't be here (they wouldn't have been born).

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
RafaRafa
There's no fun in playing it safe. Why not try something a little unhinged?
Chat with Rafa
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Estimated Japanese deaths if a land invasion would have occurred?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp