The South identified Abolitionism with violent revolution.
Racial tensions increased in Northern cities during and after World War I due to migration. Not only were poor blacks fleeing tenant farming and Jim Crow laws in the south, but southern whites were as well. They all came north to find jobs in the cities, causing them to mingle and fight for the limited jobs and housing available. The tensions grew leading to riots in some cities.
The Wilmot Proviso, which was one one event that lead up to the American Civil War, would have banned slavery in new territories and land.
As the US, among other nations, sought to abolish slavery, the South still depended on slave labor for their agriculture. In the North, manufacturing had become the dominant form of commerce.For some, the issue was whether a state had a right to continue slavery, or any other form of activity to which the federal government objected, within its own borders. Ultimately, the Southern states chose to secede rather than give up their rights, leading to the Civil War.
The Korean War was, in sense a "proxy" war between USSR and USA. Although it was between China, North Korea on one side and the UN forces on the other, it was actually Stalin who authorized Kim Il Sung to invade the newly formed South Korea. This war impacted the Cold War as tensions rose a large amount. It rose as the USSR was helping North Korea by giving them military aid. Tensions between the USA and Communist China also rose as China sent 500000 of its own troops (so called "volunteers": probably a propaganda move) to aid North Korea. Several US generals campaigned to invade China, but President Harry Truman objected out of fear for a World War Three.
by making it harder to get jobs.
It made Southerners identify Abolitionism with violent revolution.
It actually did not. Please check your question carefully!
For the most part most Americans, both North and South, saw the Brown slave revolution as being radical and dangerous. Brown was a martyr to radical abolitionists, but for most Americans, Brown's violence was madness.
For the most part most Americans, both North and South, saw the Brown slave revolution as being radical and dangerous. Brown was a martyr to radical abolitionists, but for most Americans, Brown's violence was madness.
For the most part most Americans, both North and South, saw the Brown slave revolution as being radical and dangerous. Brown was a martyr to radical abolitionists, but for most Americans, Brown's violence was madness.
It increased tensions further between the North and the South
For the most part most Americans, both North and South, saw the Brown slave revolution as being radical and dangerous. Brown was a martyr to radical abolitionists, but for most Americans, Brown's violence was madness.
The South identified Abolitionism with violent revolution.
The South identified Abolitionism with violent revolution.
The north opposed slavery; the south supported it. The north and the south began to argue about what state would be a free state and what state would be a slave state.
Who worked out to reduce tensions between the north and south over the admission of new states?