in the period 5 to 20 July 1943 were between 50,000 and 57,000. German tank write-offs were between 278 and 323. Yet the numbers of destroyed tanks alone does not tell the entire story. For example, Zetterling and Frankson list only 33 tanks destroyed for the three divisions of the SS Panzer Corps as of 17 July, but the number of operational tanks on 17 July as of 19:15 had dropped by 139, leading one to assume that 106 tanks were damaged and not able to take part in the battle, at least temporarily. Soviet casualties were 177,847 as listed in Krivosheev. However, Restayn and Moller point out that Krivosheev's figures for Central Front strength show a decline in strengh during the period 5 to 11 July 1943 of approximately 92,700, of which only 33,897 are accounted for as dead or wounded with no explanation given for the further 58,893 losses. Restayn and Moller consider that the missing 58,893 should be accounted for as casualties, in which case total Soviet casualties in this period would be approximately 235,000 (ie 177,847 plus 58,893). Soviet armor losses, again according to Krivosheev, were 1,614 tanks and assault guns destroyed.
I have now four sources that indicate the German Army suffered approximately 366,000 casualties and the Red Army suffered roughly 1,600,000 casualties at Kursk. The fighting was so bad, worse than anything by scale/intensity during the war and maybe even all of world history. I would not of wanted to be there. Up close and personal. It will only be surpassed in carnage by the battle of Armegeddon.
The campaign was a decisive Soviet success. For the first time, a major German offensive had been stopped before achieving a breakthrough. The Germans, despite using more technologically advanced armor than in previous years, were unable to break through the in-depth defenses of the Red Army, and were surprised by the significant operational reserves of the Red Army. This was an outcome that few had predicted, and it changed the pattern of operations on the Eastern Front. The victory had not been cheap; the Red Army, although preventing the Germans from achieving their goals, lost considerably more men and mat
The campaign was a decisive Soviet success. For the first time, a major German offensive had been stopped before achieving a breakthrough. The Germans, despite using more technologically advanced armor than in previous years, were unable to break through the in-depth defenses of the Red Army, and were surprised by the significant operational reserves of the Red Army. This was an outcome that few had predicted, and it changed the pattern of operations on the Eastern Front. The victory had not been cheap; the Red Army, although preventing the Germans from achieving their goals, lost considerably more men and matériel than the Wehrmact.
Over 9,000 Germans died at Kursk in 1943. In total there were over 50,000 German casualties suffered during this battle.
The Germans has 2,928 tanks. Whereas the Soviets had 5,128 tanks.
125 people died in the battle of palmitos ranch
Around 100,592 people died
6100 total
Over 9,000 Germans died at Kursk in 1943. In total there were over 50,000 German casualties suffered during this battle.
According to History Learning Site over 500,000 Germans died during the battle at Kursk. The link below has more information that you might be interested in.
how many people died at the battle of edgehill
The Germans has 2,928 tanks. Whereas the Soviets had 5,128 tanks.
many people died
125 people died in the battle of palmitos ranch
2 people died
battle of newbury
Well nearly 15 thousand people died at the Battle of Pensacola
over 1 people died
2000 people died
over 9000 person died in the battle of fulford