Northern failure might drive the four border-states into the arms of the Confederacy. Britain and France might recognise the Confederacy and send military aid. War-weariness in the North could lose Lincoln the General election of 1864.
It might have to be abandoned, since it would have been totally surrounded by enemy states. That is why Lincoln arrested Maryland politicians who were trying to swing the vote to the Confederacy - actualy breaking Habeas Corpus.
There was no Peace Treaty, because Congress did not recognise the Confederacy as a sovereign nation. The Confederacy was officially wound-up in early May 1865, which might be taken as a fixed point for the ending of hostilities, though there were still a few Confederate units West of the Mississippi engaged in small skimishes, and quite a lot of Confederate officers on the run, refusing to seek pardon. That is why Appomattox is taken as the notional end of the war, even though Joe Johnston had yet to surrender to Sherman. This was the epic moment, and those two very different men, the solemn aristocrat Lee and the plain ordinary Grant, both felt deeply that they were making history, and it brought out the noble side in both of them.
Each man was on differant sides of the war( to different perspectives)
At the beginning of the Civil War, young men from both the north and the south were very enthusiastic about fighting in the war. Northerners wanted to thrash the rebels and bring the southern states back into the Union, southerners wanted to destroy the Union army and force them to acknowledge the Confederacy as an independent nation.
It would certainly have made a lot of trouble, enclosing so much of D.C., though opinion was sharply divided in Maryland. It is commonly agreed that if all the buffer states (Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, Missouri) had joined the Confederacy, history might have been different.
The Cherokee Nation had been badly mistreated by the US government prior to the US Civil War. They helped the Confederacy to a degree because they believed they might get a "better deal" with the Confederates.
No, the British did not enter the US Civil War, although the Confederates might have welcomed them.
Effectively. The South might claim that they didn't ask for a war. But the launch of the Confederacy - in loud and defiant style - made it inevitable.
Most people would agree that he did the right thing in jailing certain leaders in Maryland who might have driven that state into the arms of the Confederates. If Maryland and the other 'buffer-states' had joined the Confederacy, the outcome might have been very different.
Northern failure might drive the four border-states into the arms of the Confederacy. Britain and France might recognise the Confederacy and send military aid. War-weariness in the North could lose Lincoln the General election of 1864.
During the American Civil War, the Confederacy's initial military plan was a simple but enviable one: to defend its territory from Union incursions. Not needing to invade the Union in order to survive, the Confederacy only needed to parry any attacks that the Union might make against it.
Today could be a lot different. There might still be slavery, there might still be a lot of things that were stopped, and there might not be a lot of things that were created by civil rights activists.
During the American Civil War, the Confederacy's initial military plan was a simple but enviable one: to defend its territory from Union incursions. Not needing to invade the Union in order to survive, the Confederacy only needed to parry any attacks that the Union might make against it.
it wont be different
they'd all be sucking my dick
they'd all be sucking my dick