answersLogoWhite

0

The Woodrow Wilson administration sought to keep down the protests against the war with legislation. The Espionage Act of 1917 was mainly to prevent spying, but there was a section that prevented anyone from encouraging someone to resist service in the armed forces.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Military History

Which were key arguments against government suppression of dissent during World War 1?

For: Dissent is unpatriotic and dangerous and must be suppressed. Against: Dissent is part of free speech and is healthy in a democracy.


Which were key arguments for and against government suppression of dissent during World War 1?

For: Dissent is unpatriotic and dangerous and must be suppressed. Against: Dissent is part of free speech and is healthy in a democracy.


What type of government was in Russia after World War 2?

After World War II, Russia was part of the Soviet Union, which operated under a one-party socialist system led by the Communist Party. This government was characterized by centralized control, state ownership of the means of production, and a lack of political pluralism. The regime suppressed dissent and maintained strict control over various aspects of life, including the economy, media, and civil liberties.


How did the government undermine civil liberties during world war 1?

During World War I, the U.S. government undermined civil liberties through the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918, which criminalized dissent and criticism of the war effort. These laws allowed for the arrest and prosecution of individuals who opposed the war or spoke out against the government, leading to widespread censorship and the suppression of free speech. Additionally, organizations like the American Protective League engaged in surveillance and intimidation of anti-war activists, further eroding civil rights in the name of national security.


What type of government was common during world war 2?

During World War II, several types of government were prominent, including totalitarian regimes and democracies. Notably, Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy operated under totalitarian systems that centralized power and suppressed dissent. In contrast, Allied nations like the United States and the United Kingdom maintained democratic governments, although they also implemented wartime measures that expanded government powers. Overall, the conflict highlighted the stark differences between authoritarian and democratic governance.

Related Questions

Which were key arguments for and against government suppression of dissent during World War 1?

For: Dissent is unpatriotic and dangerous and must be suppressed. Against: Dissent is part of free speech and is healthy in a democracy.


Which were key arguments against government suppression of dissent during World War 1?

For: Dissent is unpatriotic and dangerous and must be suppressed. Against: Dissent is part of free speech and is healthy in a democracy.


What is a sentence for dissent?

meaning:to be in disagreement. This is not an argument against dissent and disagreement


How did brezhnev's leadership of the soviet union differ from that of khrushchev?

Brezchnev suppressed dissent at home and abroad more than Khrushchev had


How human rights were violated in the tiananmen square?

During the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989, the Chinese government violently suppressed pro-democracy demonstrators, leading to widespread human rights violations. The military's crackdown resulted in thousands of deaths, arbitrary arrests, and the use of lethal force against unarmed civilians. Freedom of expression was severely curtailed, as the government censored information, restricted media coverage, and persecuted those who spoke out against the regime. The events highlighted systemic repression and the government's unwillingness to tolerate dissent.


How did Americans demonstrate patriotism and how did the government control the dissent against World War 1?

blah blah blah blah me no no me is dumb dumb


What will happen if you publicly say A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government in China?

Publicly stating that "A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government" in China could lead to serious repercussions, as it may be interpreted as dissent against the ruling Communist Party. Such expressions can be viewed as subversive or anti-government, potentially resulting in arrest, detention, or other forms of government retaliation. The Chinese government maintains strict control over political speech and dissent, making such statements highly risky.


Which means dissent is against the law?

In some places, dissent can be considered illegal if it undermines the government or incites violence. Laws against dissent can vary widely, and it's essential to understand the specific legal context of a particular country or region to determine what constitutes illegal dissent. However, freedom of expression and the right to peacefully protest are fundamental human rights protected by international law.


Did people go on strike against the one child policy?

Yes, there were instances of protests and dissent against China's one-child policy, though they were often suppressed by the government. Some individuals and groups expressed their opposition through strikes, demonstrations, and other forms of resistance, highlighting the social and economic pressures caused by the policy. However, these actions were met with strict government crackdowns, making widespread organized strikes rare. Overall, while there were expressions of discontent, they were not widespread or sustained in the face of governmental control.


What does it mean by the claim that people have a right of revolution?

It means that people have a right to dissent against a government that they feel has grown tyrannical and no longer represents the majority of citizens.


How do you get a dissent call in soccer?

The referee can give a dissent charge against you if you make rude or insulting comments to or about the referee or linesmen.


What means of dissent is against the law?

threatening the life of a leader