That's one (of the many) of the traditional reasons for fighting wars. If a society wins the war then it's right; if they lose, then it was wrong...comes under the headings of: "Would've, Should've, Could've"; "Why did we do this!?"; "If we had it all to do over again, we wouldn't have done it!" "If I knew then, what I know now", "If I knew it was gonna turn out this way, I wouldn't have done it!" And of course, the all time favorite, "The end justifies the means."
The US was large enough and industrialized enough, to sustain a normal society, and fight a war at the same time.
A resource war can be one of or combination of a few things. But a good example would be the Persian Gulf War. Iraq invaded Kuwait because Iraq's economy was shot and oil was a perfect resource to exploit for economic means. A fictitious example of a resource war was the resource war Between The U.S. and the Peoples Chinese Republic from the Fallout universe.
Because that cost many of are soldiers lives and it took a lot of soldiers from their home to fight.
This question requires a subjective, opinionated answer. With that said, many historians will suggest that the strongest resource for the South at the very beginning of the war was its cotton crops. Even with a blockade by the Union, cotton from the South was able to reach European markets. In fact, for most of the war, a permit from the Federal government allowed Northern companies to buy cotton from the South. Also, it may be suggested that the South's greatest resource at the beginning was a strategic one. This was due to the large amount of territory of the South and its huge coastline. In addition to that was the fact that the South would only need to fight a defensive war for its victory. On the other hand, the North had to invade and fight on unfamiliar soil and destroy all Confederate resistance. It's clear that there are other valid opinions.
A person who refused to fight in the war was termed a conscientious objector.
Members of society were being drafted to fight the Vietnam War; consequently, they were against it.
freed slaves willing to help fight the south
not to fight again or they will get told off
The greatest resource was cotton. During the civil war, the South traded cotton for guns and other supplies. The South also withheld cotton shipments to Britain to convince them to help them fight in the Civil War. This was called the Cotton Diplomacy.
it is a problem because we all need it. some of us places don't have this resource and it is difficult to find so it causes a conflict. the conflict is a fight that can be solved ex. war.
After the Civil War by becoming educated and contributing members of society. Many helped to later fight for equality and created business's.
The US was large enough and industrialized enough, to sustain a normal society, and fight a war at the same time.
A resource war can be one of or combination of a few things. But a good example would be the Persian Gulf War. Iraq invaded Kuwait because Iraq's economy was shot and oil was a perfect resource to exploit for economic means. A fictitious example of a resource war was the resource war Between The U.S. and the Peoples Chinese Republic from the Fallout universe.
Th Office of Economic Opportunity was created under President Johnson's Great Society Program.
short answer: yes he did fight in the Revolutionary War.
Because that cost many of are soldiers lives and it took a lot of soldiers from their home to fight.
Many who didn't have to fight the war, were for it. Many who had to fight the war, were against it.