It changed naval warfare for ever. As soon as the British heard about the battle they immediately set to work to armour their navy.
The Union Monitor and the Confederate Merrimack, renamed the Virginia, traded blows in Hampton Roads for several hours but neither was able to disable the other. Eventually both ships retreated to their bases, the Virginia more the worse for wear, and never met again.
ANSWER:The battle of the ironclads pitted the Northern Monitor, against the Southern Merrimack in March of 1862.The Monitor proved to the be superior vessel, although neither of the two ships were declared a winner.But, this event marked the first time that ships were fitted with armor for battle.
It was important because the Allies were now in Europe in force.
It was important for British morale to breach the Atlantic Wall and fight in Europe again
It led to the demise of German power in Africa.
The battle between the USS Monitor and the formerly known Union ship called the USS Merrimack, was the first ever battle between ironclad warships. The Merrimack had been reconstructed as an ironclad and renamed the CSS Virginia. Although the Monitor received the most damage between the two ships, for all practical purposes it was a draw.
The Union Monitor and the Confederate Merrimack, renamed the Virginia, traded blows in Hampton Roads for several hours but neither was able to disable the other. Eventually both ships retreated to their bases, the Virginia more the worse for wear, and never met again.
ANSWER:The battle of the ironclads pitted the Northern Monitor, against the Southern Merrimack in March of 1862.The Monitor proved to the be superior vessel, although neither of the two ships were declared a winner.But, this event marked the first time that ships were fitted with armor for battle.
The outcome of the clash between the Union ship Monitor and the Confederate ship Virginia (formerly known as the Merrimack) during the Battle of Hampton Roads on March 9, 1862, was a historic stalemate. While neither side achieved a decisive victory, the battle marked the first meeting of ironclad warships and demonstrated the superiority of iron over wooden ships. This engagement signified a turning point in naval warfare, leading to the decline of wooden naval vessels and the rise of ironclads.
Neither side won
Neither side won
Neither side won
Both sides claimed that they wont the battle. However, present-day historians agree that neither was the victor. It was a draw.
The most likely outcome of the current situation is difficult to predict with certainty, as it depends on various factors and how they unfold. It is important to closely monitor developments and consider different possibilities to prepare for potential outcomes.
There is no important outcome of the council of Jerusalem. It was one of the less-important council's
Tactically the battle outcome was indecisive. Strategically it was a Union decisive success, because the Confederate ironclad never more attempted to break through the blockade and engage the Union Navy, thus remaining confined within the artillery range of Charleston's forts and becoming therefore a "warship in being". From the technological point of view it was the first fighting between ironclads. Furthermore it marked a superiority although not decisive of the iron armours against the smooth-bore guns.
The outcome was that the colinist won. The outcome was that the colinist won.