who opposed (argued against) conscription in Australia during World War 1 and why?
who opposed (argued against) conscription in Australia during world war 1 and why?
Non-British immigrants opposed conscription during World War I primarily due to their desire to avoid forced military service in conflicts that did not directly involve their home countries. Many felt a strong allegiance to their native nations and feared that conscription would compel them to fight against their fellow countrymen or in wars they did not support. Additionally, some immigrants faced discrimination and suspicion, leading to concerns that conscription might be used to target them unfairly. This resistance reflected broader anxieties about national identity and loyalty amidst the war.
Conscription
because i fatered
Conscription
In Britain it was sixteen.
The Compulsory conscription was ordered by Hitler in the World War 2, that was against the Treaty of Versailles
Non-British immigrants opposed conscription during World War I primarily due to their desire to avoid forced military service in conflicts that did not directly involve their home countries. Many felt a strong allegiance to their native nations and feared that conscription would compel them to fight against their fellow countrymen or in wars they did not support. Additionally, some immigrants faced discrimination and suspicion, leading to concerns that conscription might be used to target them unfairly. This resistance reflected broader anxieties about national identity and loyalty amidst the war.
Conscription was used in World War 1, when men wouldn't join the army the Government used conscription as a way of making men join. They had absolutely no choice.
Propaganda was used in Australia during World War I to sway public opinion towards conscription. It involved exaggerating the threat to Australia, questioning the loyalty of those who opposed conscription, and portraying conscription as necessary for the survival of the nation. This propaganda campaign divided the country, leading to two referendums on conscription in 1916 and 1917, both of which were defeated.
Conscription
Many French Canadians also opposed conscription in 1917.
Many opposed their male family members being forced to fighting a war in Europe which did not threaten Australia.
In World War II, English Canadians were generally more supportive of conscription compared to their French Canadian counterparts. This support was largely due to their stronger ties to Britain and the belief in the necessity of military service to support the war effort. In contrast, many French Canadians opposed conscription, viewing it as an infringement on their rights and expressing a desire to avoid being drawn into the conflict. This divide contributed to significant tensions within Canadian society during the war.
because i fatered
Conscription
During World War I, Canadian conscription was a contentious issue, with strong divisions between English-speaking Canadians, who largely supported it, and French-speaking Canadians, who opposed it due to fears of alienation and the belief that it disproportionately affected their communities. In World War II, while conscription was again controversial, the context had shifted; many Canadians accepted it as a necessity, though tensions remained, particularly in Quebec. Overall, conscription highlighted regional, linguistic, and cultural divides within Canada, shaping national identity and political discourse.
Many people thought of conscription as a sign of loyalty to Britain, their mothercountry, and thought that it would also support those men who were already fighting. However, trade unions feared that their members might be replaced by cheaper foreign or female labour and opposed conscription. Some groups argued that the whole war was immoral, and it was unjust to force people to fight.