The policy of deterrence is based on the idea that whoever attacks first will be robustly attacked in return, hence they are 'deterred' from launching the initial attack.
The concept dates back to the 1950-1980 days of the Cold War, whereby the USSR knew if they attacked the United States first, they would be immediately attacked by one or more of the US nuclear triad of B-52's, nuclear missiles launched from the nuclear-powered submarines hidden deep in the ocean, plus land-based rockets carrying nuclear warheads - the theory said the USSR would be deterred from launching a nuclear attack on the United States.
osama
Deterrence
nuclear deterrence - the idea that if you attack me with nuclear weapons then I will attack you back with nuclear weaponsmutual assured destruction - the idea that if you attack me with nuclear weapons then I will totally destroy you with nuclear weapons and if I attack you with nuclear weapons then you will totally destroy me with nuclear weapons - thus any nuclear attack by either party will result in the certain destruction of both parties
Fred Korkisch This is a rather artificial question, because in the official literature the term "deterrence by denial" was never used, asked, nor answered, nor mentioned. The post-nuclear literature tried to invent and imagined a number of terms and phrases that were never used by the people who wrote about nuclear war planning and doctrine. Deterrence was either used in relation to * Gradual Deterrence (see: The gradual use of nuclear weapons, or a gradual use of force, like the escalation President Johnson used against North Vietnam etc.); * Minimum Deterrence (see: The threat to use force, including nuclear weapons on a limited scale, or the minimum number of strategic weapons which provides a credible deterrence; see SALT, START); * Finite Deterrence (see: The nuclear capabilties which will survive any enemy attack, available for a devastating counterstrike, like SLBM-weapons on submarines; * Deterrence by Punishment (this is a rather juridical term, used after WW II, to explain the legal rightfulness of the bombardments of German and Japanese cities, as a justified "punishment" for the aggressions of both states, used later on for the possible use of nuclear weapons as a retaliatorial strike. To explain "Deterrence by Denial" one can follow the logic of protection of nuclear delivery systems by various measures, like dispersal of bombers, missiles in silos, SLBM-submarines etc.
containment
deterrence!! :)
Deterrence was a Cold War strategy employed by the United States and Soviet Union to prevent nuclear war through the threat of massive retaliation. The idea was that both sides would refrain from attacking each other out of fear of the devastating consequences. This policy aimed to maintain peace by maintaining a balance of power and instilling fear of mutual destruction.
osama
Gary F. Wheatley has written: 'Information warfare and deterrence' -- subject(s): Deterrence (Strategy), Military policy, Information warfare
Roger D. Speed has written: 'Strategic deterrence in the 1980s' -- subject(s): Deterrence (Strategy), Military policy, Strategic forces
Deterrence
The policy of assimilation is based on the idea that minority groups should adopt the culture, values, and customs of the dominant group in society. This approach aims to reduce differences and promote unity among different cultural groups.
The idea that in time the local populations would adopt french culture and become like the french
The idea that in time the local populations would adopt french culture and become like the french
Deterrence was one of the major features.
a policy based on on the idea that a country should sell more goods than it buys
Stephen Shenfield has written: 'The nuclear predicament' -- subject(s): Communism and nuclear warfare, Government policy, Military policy, Nuclear warfare, Nuclear weapons 'The mathematical-statistical methodology of the contemporary Soviet family budget survey' 'Minimum nuclear deterrence' -- subject(s): Deterrence (Strategy), Military policy, Nuclear warfare