answersLogoWhite

0

It was successful in that Germany & Austria-Hungary were defeated, however... worthwhile or worth the cost? This is an opinion type question. Not if you consider that the war was avoidable. Popular and political setiment after the Great War was that it should have been avoided or prevented, or ended earlier. I agree. Germany & Austria-Hungary were not evil empires trying to conquer the world, however they were considered the aggressors because they struck first. Serbia and they were the most to blame.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

RafaRafa
There's no fun in playing it safe. Why not try something a little unhinged?
Chat with Rafa
TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
RossRoss
Every question is just a happy little opportunity.
Chat with Ross
More answers

personally i would would say no ww1 was called "the war to end all wars" and one of the consequences of ww1 was ww2 and so many lives were wasted by sending men "over the top"

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

Probably not. So many deaths, so much new terrible ways to kill people. And the terms of the surrender directly contributed to WWII.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was World War 1 successful
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp