During the American Civil War, General Grant's armies secured tremendous advantages for the North through each year of the conflict. Being driven by Grant's tenacious and aggressive leadership, these armies broke the South in two with their capture of Vicksburg (Mississippi) in the Western Theater. Later, in the Eastern Theater, armies led by Grant pushed the Confederates back to the gates of Richmond and beyond, resulting in the end of the war as a whole.
North: General Ulysses S. Grant South: General Robert E. Lee
The general in chief of all Union armies at the end of the war was Ulysses S. Grant.
The manufacture of all kinds of war-supplies, including the new rifle-barrelled artillery. The capability to move large armies by rail.
Probably rivers, since one of them is named, "the army of the Potomac."
Neither side was prepared for war - there were no big, trained armies. But the strategy suggested by the elderly Union General-in-Chief (The slow 'Anaconda Plan') was actually the most realistic proposal, and in the end the North carried out something very similar.
Grant's advantage was that the Northern farms and industries could keep his forces well supplied.
North: General Ulysses S. Grant South: General Robert E. Lee
Ulysses S. Grant was the general of all Northern Armies.
Yes, he was General-in-Chief of all the Union armies.
North. He ended the war as General-in-Chief of the Union armies.
The last General-in-Chief of the Northern (Union) armies was U.S. Grant, appointed in March 1864.
The general in chief of all Union armies at the end of the war was Ulysses S. Grant.
The North had huge advantages in the US Civil War. It's large population enabled it to build large armies. The North had an industrial base that enabled it to produce weapons and build warships in safe harbors such as New York City.
Bigger population to recruit armies from. Modern industry to manufacture war-supplies. A President of exceptional political talent.
A much larger population from which to raise armies, a vastly larger industrial capacity with which to supply those armies, several times the amount of railroad mileage upon which to transport those armies and supplies to the battle fronts
I kno!!!! look it up in your U.S. history book...ahaha
The chief advantage was simply a much bigger population from which to recruit armies. When Grant became General-in-Chief, he ended the system of prisoner-exchange, knowing that the Confederates would run out of men first. So that advantage steadily mounted-up. Another was the much greater railroad mileage in the North, and the capacity to move troops and supplies by rail. Again, as the Union armies began to destroy Southern railroads, the disparity in rail mileage widened further.