South-Gained more population
North-Got more money towards there goverment because the 3/5 compromise for every the 3 of the 5 slaves 3 of them had to be taxed so the tax went to the norths goverment
An advantage to the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was that slavery would not be permitted in the territory that is now the state of Missouri. A disadvantage to the Missouri Compromise was that people who believed in slavery in the South could not move north to gain more land and keep their slaves.
The chance for a couple more slave-states, and a tighter enforcement of the Fugutive Slave Act, with official slave-catchers employed to hunt down runaways.
1850 - the Fugitive Slave Act, which was meant to show support for the legality of slavery, but which backfired on them, causing Harriet Beecher Stowe to write 'Uncle Tom's Cabin' as a protest. 1854 - the chance of new slave-states, if the people of each state were willing to vote for slavery.
The assurance that there would be no new slave-states North of the Missouri line.
The Republicans gained the presidency from the Compromise of 1877. The Democrats agreed to accept the Republican presidential elector, Rutherford B. Hayes.
The admission of California as free soil, and the abolition of the slave-trade in DC.
They gained all states above the imaginary line, i dont remember where it was set
The Missouri Compromise was not a cause of the war - it was a reasonable deal that delayed hostilities for forty years. The Compromise of 1850 included a provision to toughen-up the Fugitive Slave Act, and this became an emotive issue in the North, especially when Uncle Tom's Cabin was published soon after.
The Missouri Compromise provided that no Slave State could be established to the north of a line represented by the parallel 36° 30' coincident with the Southern boundary of Missouri.
It permitted slavery in those two states, as the price of California being admitted as free soil.
The Missouri Compromise, which said that slavery was to be banned anywhere north of the 36th parallel, with the exception of Missouri.
problems were solved
An advantage to the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was that slavery would not be permitted in the territory that is now the state of Missouri. A disadvantage to the Missouri Compromise was that people who believed in slavery in the South could not move north to gain more land and keep their slaves.
Clay had a hand in both the main Compromises. 1820 - the legality of new slave-states, South of a certain parallel. 1850 - the new toughened-up Fugitive Slave Act.
If we can compromise we will both give up a little but we will gain a lot.
The chance for a couple more slave-states, and a tighter enforcement of the Fugutive Slave Act, with official slave-catchers employed to hunt down runaways.
to gain protection land