Yes, there were many massacres and atrocities, including the infamous My Lai Massacre in which 504 unarmed civilians were massacred by the US Army. There were also massive numbers of rapes, tortures, and killings of civilians on all sides. Arguably, the use of Agent Orange can be called a human rights violation as it's impacted generations to come with birth defects.
Both North Vietnam and the USA/South Vietnam employed widespread terror against civilians. The North Vietnamese assassinated an estimated 36,725 civilians between 1957 and 1972 and would go on to kill perhaps hundreds of thousands more after the war. Throught the war, US armed and trained South Vietnamese military and paramilitary forces engaged in killings, reprisals, and bombardments against villagers supporting the VC, killing 400,000 to 500,000 civilians between 1965 and 1975 (citing Barbra Harff). The toll is even more if you consider the US-backed Diem Regime (1955-1963; 50,000 killed) which used the same terror tactics.
There was also the CIA's infamous Phoenix Program (1968-1972), which was a coordinated effort to neutralize the civilian infrastructure of the VC through means of blackmail, kidnapping, torture, and assassination, US troops and CIA trained 'counter terror' teams did the killing. As of mid-1971 the South Vietnamese estimated the death toll due to the CIA's Phoenix Program to be approximately 40,994. During Phoenix, suspected VC were kept in tiger cages without food or water for days on end and often tortured physically. It was common to US soldiers to interrogate prisoners in planes or helicopters and subsequently throw them out (death flights).
there were many massacres and atrocities, including the infamous My Lai Massacre in which 504 unarmed civilians were massacred by the US army. There were also massive numbers of rapes, tortures, and killings of civilians on all sides. Arguably, the use of Agent Orange can be called a human rights violation as it's impacted generations to come with birth defects.
Both North Vietnam and the USA/South Vietnam employed widespread terror against civilians. The North Vietnamese assassinated an estimated 36,725 civilians between 1957 and 1972 and would go on to kill perhaps hundreds of thousands more after the war. Throught the war, US armed and trained South Vietnamese military and paramilitary forces engaged in killings, reprisals, and bombardments against villagers supporting the VC, killing 400,000 to 500,000 civilians between 1965 and 1975 (citing Barbra Harff). The toll is even more if you consider the US-backed Diem Regime (1955-1963; 50,000 killed) which used the same terror tactics.
There was also the CIA's infamous Phoenix Program (1968-1972), which was a coordinated effort to neutralize the civilian infrastructure of the VC through means of blackmail, kidnapping, torture, and assassination, US troops and CIA trained 'counter terror' teams did the killing. As of mid-1971 the South Vietnamese estimated the death toll due to the CIA's Phoenix Program to be approximately 40,994. During Phoenix, suspected VC were kept in tiger cages without food or water for days on end and often tortured physically. It was common to US soldiers to interrogate prisoners in planes or helicopters and subsequently throw them out (death flights).
Everyone did, this is why war is a very bad thing. The Nazi's violated peoples human rights a lot but so did the Americans when they killed innocent civilians in the firebombing of Dresden and when they dropped the Atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
japan
Chinese
When you strict or violate human rights, it means to take the basic rights of humanity away. Such as a home, electricity, food, drink and ect like that. Also, human rights is to do with treating someone as if they are bad, like dirt. So if you break one of those then you are violating human rights towards humans. Answer 2: Basic human rights are freedom, freedom of thought, freedom of speech, expression, conscience and religion.
South Vietnam's social structure was similar to the US's social structure, except it was under extreme military influence due to the constant warring over the last 30 years; e.g. many people wore military clothing (surplus or otherwise), military surplus construction material covered civilian homes, bridges, roads, etc. South Vietnam was "supposed" to be structured (modeled after) along "free" country lines, such as the US, or any other NON-Communist country. E.g. freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of education, selling & trading (capitalism), etc. US personnel in country, were to respect those same social traditions, as they would in the United States. Any traditional ingrained Vietnamese traditions were NOT interferred with by the US Government, unless they violated common sense human dignity laws. If the South Vietnamese Government expected to continue to receive US assistance, they had to comply with US Policies of human rights & dignity.
Ethnic cleansing involves the violation of all human rights and especially the right to life, liberty and property.
No
Lots
i can't
i can't
Everyone did, this is why war is a very bad thing. The Nazi's violated peoples human rights a lot but so did the Americans when they killed innocent civilians in the firebombing of Dresden and when they dropped the Atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Because 9 million innocent people were killed
human rights articles 4+5 the ten commandments-
well yes but most are violated
Human rights exist in every country in the world. They are human rights after all and not humans of a country rights. In Syria, however, these rights are violated because of the demonstrations against the current administration.
Well there's too many to list , but if you look at all of the rights that humans should have , just list the ones that weren't violated
Some consider the official treatment of immigrants and their families violates the basic human rights as set forth by the U.N.