Civilian control of the military is a doctrine in militaryand political science that places ultimate responsibility for a country's strategic decision-making in the hands of the civilian political leadership, rather than professional military officers.
Civilian control of the military is a doctrine in militaryand political science that places ultimate responsibility for a country's strategic decision-making in the hands of the civilian political leadership, rather than professional military officers.
To improve U.S military technology and pressure the Soviet Union to improve its military technology.
Finding competent generals Constant changes to military leadership Poor strategic planning by officers
Operational level
Brice F. Harris has written: 'America, technology, and strategic culture' -- subject(s): Military doctrine, Military art and science, Technological innovations, Strategy, Strategic culture
Yoav Ben-Horin has written: 'Israel's strategic doctrine' -- subject(s): Military policy, Strategy
Civilian control of the military is a doctrine in militaryand political science that places ultimate responsibility for a country's strategic decision-making in the hands of the civilian political leadership, rather than professional military officers.
Civilian control of the military is a doctrine in militaryand political science that places ultimate responsibility for a country's strategic decision-making in the hands of the civilian political leadership, rather than professional military officers.
Ariel Levite has written: 'Offense and defense in Israeli military doctrine' -- subject(s): Defenses, National security 'Intelligence and strategic surprises' -- subject(s): Midway, Battle of, 1942, Military intelligence, Pearl Harbor (Hawaii), Attack on, 1941, Preemptive attack (Military science), Surprise (Military science)
John G. Hines has written: 'Defense and counteroffensive under the new Soviet military doctrine' -- subject(s): Defensive (Military science), Military doctrine, Offensive (Military science)
Glenn A. Kent has written: 'Thinking about America's defense' -- subject(s): Biography, Decision making, Defenses, Generals, Military planning, Military policy, National security, Officers, Strategic forces, United States, United States. Air Force 'Defining the role of airpower in joint missions' -- subject(s): Military doctrine, Unified operations (Military science), Air power 'A framework for enhancing operational capabilities' -- subject(s): Armed Forces, Military planning, Operational readiness, Military policy, Procurement 'First-strike stability and strategic defenses' -- subject(s): Strategic forces, Nuclear crisis stability, First strike (Nuclear strategy) 'An agenda for the Strategic Defense Initiative' -- subject(s): Strategic Defense Initiative, Nuclear warfare 'A new concept for streamlining up-front planning' -- subject(s): Management, Military planning, United States, United States. Dept. of Defense
Vicksburg stood as a fortified artillery emplacement at a strategic location on the Mississippi River.
Robert H. Scales has written: 'The future U.S. military presence in Asia' -- subject(s): American Military assistance, Military assistance, American, Military policy, Military relations, National security, Strategic aspects, Strategic aspects of East Asia
A location does not have a strong military. Rome developed of a strong military for historical reasons.
Don't colonize places we call part of a our area of strategic interest.
The product of joint force development is a cohesive and interoperable military force that can effectively operate across multiple domains and with different service branches. This includes the integration of capabilities, training, doctrine, and tactics to achieve strategic objectives.