0
The relationship between speed/mobility, armor protection, and firepower is the "measuring stick" for determining the overall combat effectiveness of an armored fighting vehicle. Too much, or too little, of any of the three measurable categories produces a vehicle that has limitations that can be easily exploited by an enemy.
An example would be the German Tiger tank (all variants). Although extremely well armored, and carrying the incredibly potent 88mm gun, the Tiger in effect was nothing more than folklore legend when it comes down to true battlefield statistics. It's incredible lack of speed/mobility and extreme mechanical reliability problems turned what was originally designed as the ultimate ground superiority weapon into nothing more than an ambush gun hidden in barns covered with hay to fire from a concealed position.
It's allied counterpart would be the Sherman. Although the Sherman received bad press during the war, it in all effects was quite possibly the most well balanced tank of WW2. It had better than average speed/mobility, it had reasonable armor protection, and the ease of which the main gun could be changed out based on the original design, it proved that the tank could mount multiple guns with acceptable firepower throughout the war. However, not one single thing "shines" about the Sherman. It simply did everything "OK". While the Tiger "shined" when it came to armor protection and firepower, it's lack of mobility proved to be it's Achilles's Heel.
Speed/mobility, armor protection, and firepower must be used in "relative terms" to the enemy forces AND the terrain the which combat is taking place in order for the formula to be used accurately and correctly. For example: If the combat terrain is the grounds of a large international airport with lots of stretches of paved concrete, and the combat forces being faced are infantry in shorts and T-shirts throwing marbles with their bare hands, a bicycle mounted man wearing Carharts, with a face shield, carrying a slingshot, completely overwhelms the opponent on all facets of speed/mobility, armor protection, and firepower. However, if someone were to show up to that same fight driving a Ferrari, with bullet proof glass, mounting a 9mm handgun... That would go down in the historical record as "the greatest armored fighting vehicle to ever take the field".
This is why it is so important to take into account the opponent and the terrain when using this formula. A perfectly designed vehicle could be able to outmatch any possible opponent in any possible terrain in all of the categories. The difficulty of achieving this balance is:
-As you add more speed/mobility, you must sacrifice weight which reduces both armor protection and firepower.
-Armor protection increases weight, sacrificing speed/mobility and/or firepower.
-Firepower increases weight but also adds to the chassis size, meaning you loose both armor protection and speed/mobility.
What else can I help you with?
How did tanks change over the years?
Tanks have evolved significantly since their introduction in World War I. Initially, they were slow, heavily armored vehicles with limited firepower, primarily designed for infantry support. Over the years, advancements in technology led to improvements in speed, mobility, and firepower, with the incorporation of more effective armor materials and weapon systems. Modern tanks now feature sophisticated targeting systems, enhanced mobility, and greater versatility, allowing them to engage in complex combat scenarios on diverse terrains.
What the tanks advantages and disadvant?
Tanks offer significant advantages on the battlefield, including heavy armor protection, firepower, and mobility, allowing them to breach enemy lines and support infantry effectively. However, their disadvantages include high operational costs, vulnerability to anti-tank weapons, and limited maneuverability in urban or rough terrain. Additionally, tanks require extensive logistical support and can be less effective in asymmetric warfare situations where mobility and stealth are prioritized.
What does a samurai and knight have in common about their armor?
Both samurai and knights wore armor designed to protect them in battle while allowing for mobility. Samurai armor, often made of lacquered plates and silk, was flexible and lightweight, enabling agility. In contrast, knights typically wore heavy metal armor that provided robust protection but could be cumbersome. Both types of armor reflected the culture and warfare of their respective societies, incorporating unique designs and materials to suit their combat needs.
What armour did the samurai use?
Samurai armor, known as "yoroi," was designed for both protection and mobility. It typically consisted of a combination of iron and leather plates laced together with silk or cotton cords, allowing flexibility. Key components included the kabuto (helmet), do (chest armor), and sode (shoulder guards). The armor often featured elaborate designs and motifs, reflecting the samurai's status and clan affiliation.
What type of armor did coronado wear?
Hernán Cortés, the Spanish conquistador who led the expedition that caused the fall of the Aztec Empire, typically wore armor that consisted of a breastplate, greaves, and a helmet made from steel or iron. This armor was designed to provide protection in battle while allowing for some mobility. The style was influenced by European armoring techniques of the early 16th century, featuring elements like chainmail and plate armor. However, it was often heavy and cumbersome, which could hinder movement during combat.
How did tanks change over the years?
Tanks have evolved significantly since their introduction in World War I. Initially, they were slow, heavily armored vehicles with limited firepower, primarily designed for infantry support. Over the years, advancements in technology led to improvements in speed, mobility, and firepower, with the incorporation of more effective armor materials and weapon systems. Modern tanks now feature sophisticated targeting systems, enhanced mobility, and greater versatility, allowing them to engage in complex combat scenarios on diverse terrains.
What the tanks advantages and disadvant?
Tanks offer significant advantages on the battlefield, including heavy armor protection, firepower, and mobility, allowing them to breach enemy lines and support infantry effectively. However, their disadvantages include high operational costs, vulnerability to anti-tank weapons, and limited maneuverability in urban or rough terrain. Additionally, tanks require extensive logistical support and can be less effective in asymmetric warfare situations where mobility and stealth are prioritized.
What tactics would an individual use against a foe in heavy armor?
Mobility, heavy weapons, terrain
Why did Knights start wearing plate armor and how did this affect knights?
Knights started wearing plate armor for better protection against arrows and weapons in battle. This armor increased their defense but also reduced their mobility. Additionally, plate armor allowed knights to display their status and wealth.
What are the different types of fantasy armor that characters can wear in a medieval-themed role-playing game?
In a medieval-themed role-playing game, characters can wear different types of fantasy armor such as plate armor, chainmail, leather armor, and scale armor. Each type offers varying levels of protection and mobility for the character.
What was the world's strongest tank?
In terms of armor i'd say the British Challenger II tank But in terms of firepower i think it is Equal to USA's Abrams tank http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challenger_2
What is an similarity between the samurai and Knights armor?
Both samurai and knight armor were designed to provide protection in battle while allowing for mobility. Samurai armor, known as "yoroi," was typically lighter and more flexible, incorporating layers of leather and metal, while knight armor, particularly in the later medieval period, was often made of heavy plate steel. Both types of armor also featured intricate designs and embellishments, reflecting the wearer's status and cultural identity. Additionally, both samurai and knights used their armor as a means of psychological warfare, showcasing their prowess and intimidating their opponents.
How much did ancient roman armor weigh?
Ancient Roman armor, particularly the standard lorica segmentata, typically weighed between 20 to 30 pounds (9 to 14 kg). This weight could vary depending on the specific design and the materials used, such as iron or bronze. Additional gear, like helmets and shields, could add to the overall weight that soldiers carried, but the armor was designed to balance protection with mobility.
How many times was the Panzer redesigned?
There were numerous Panzer models. You'll find a wealth of information if you Google "panzer". I've posted a couple of links to the right. See the Related Link for "Panzerpage" to the bottom for the answer.
Why is the skin between the plates of armor on the armadillo important?
The skin allows the armor to be flexible.
What is the difference between the Europe medieval knights armor than the samurai armor?
how are you going
Why do clones wear armor when it just slows them?
Consider why bulletproof vests were invented. They serve merely as a measure of protection. Otherwise it wouldn't be the Grand Army--it'd be the Grand Sacrifices. Yes, the armor slows them down, but it also allows them to survive long enough to compensate for that lack of speed in devastating rains of firepower.
