Chat with our AI personalities
The principle of letting the people of each new state vote on whether it would be slave or free.
It was a temptation for every bully-boy in America (from both sides) to cross into the thinly-populated territory of Kansas and intimidate the locals. The ensuing violence was dubbed 'Bleeding Kansas', and it seemed to demonstrate that the slavery issue would never be resolved, except through combat.
Some actually say that these were the first shots of the Civil War.
Indian uprising, drunken cowboys, and train and stagecoach robbers all caused violence in the Kansas Territory. Kansas City was a major train depot for the cattle industry.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act also led to "Bleeding Kansas," a mini civil war that erupted in Kansas in 1856. Northerners and Southerners flooded Kansas in 1854 and 1855, determined to convert the future state to their view on slavery.
Prior to the Civil War, several bloody clashes occurred between pro-slave and pro-free citizens while they were deciding their own status: whether to allow slavery or not, when they became a state.
Bleeding Kansas
No
To try to influence the local 'Popular Sovereignty' vote on whether Kansas would be a slave-state or free soil.Thats wrong the answer is They wanted to make sure Kansas became pro-slave. -$ane