Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: it was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The founding fathers didn't explicitly write the word "slavery" but they did include key clauses protecting the institution.
However, he did not believe that white and black people should have the same rights. In the fourth debate with Stephen A Douglas at Charleston, Illinois in September 18, 1958, Lincoln said this:
"I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor o f bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races -- that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together in terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot live, while they do remain together there must be a position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything."
Lincoln's position on social and political equality for black people evolved over the course of his presidency. In his last speech, he argued for limited black suffrage, saying that any black man who served the Union during the Civil Wat should have the right to vote.
*farts*
The Dred Scott decision or Dred Scott v. Sandford, took place in 1857. His case was based on the fact that he and his wife Harriet Scott were slaves, but had lived in states and territories where slavery was illegal, including Illinois and Minnesota (which was then part of the Wisconsin Territory). Dred Scott lost the case when The United States Supreme Court ruled seven to two, on the grounds that he, nor any person of African ancestry, could claim citizenship in the United States, and that therefore Scott could not bring suit in federal court under diversity of citizenship rules.
If you are referring to Czar Nicholas II, it is because he was not a military commander by training, even though he thought he was really quite fantastic.
Lincoln's decision to fire General McClellan in 1862 is often viewed as a necessary move to spur more aggressive military action during the Civil War. McClellan's cautious approach and reluctance to engage decisively frustrated Lincoln, who sought a more proactive strategy. While some argue that McClellan had strengths, particularly in organization and training, his hesitance ultimately led Lincoln to seek a leader who would take the fight to the Confederacy. The subsequent appointment of General Grant marked a turning point in the war, suggesting that Lincoln's decision was ultimately justified.
it was being discriminated against because of its communist government, and Soviet Russia pulled out of the war
*farts*
The South generally supported the Dred Scott decision because it upheld the rights of slaveowners to take their slaves into any territory. They saw it as a victory for states' rights and slaveholding interests.
Many Southerners supported the Dred Scott decision because it reinforced the rights of slaveholders to take their slaves into free territories. They viewed the decision as a victory for states' rights and property rights over federal power.
The South supported the Dred Scott decision, as it reinforced the rights of slave owners to take their slaves into territories where slavery was prohibited. They viewed it as a victory for protecting their property rights and upholding the institution of slavery.
Southern slave owners were happy with the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision because it allowed them to take their slaves into slave free territories and not give up ownership. The case undermined local sovereignty.
The Dred Scott Decision helped lead to the Civil War because it caused fighting between the North and South. The North was angry because people in the north had decided not to allow slavery in their states, and the Dred Scott decision allowed slaves to be brought into their states. The Dred Scott decision basically said that if a slave was brought to a free state they were still a slave because they were property. so even a free state wasn't really free. Most southerners were happy with the decision because it allowed them to take slaves with them to free states and territories and reinforced the idea that slaves had no rights as U.S. citizens. Dred Scott's case caused more trouble between the North and South.
The ruling in the Dred Scott case allowed slave owners to take their slaves with them into the Western territories of the United States.
The Dred Scott decision or Dred Scott v. Sandford, took place in 1857. His case was based on the fact that he and his wife Harriet Scott were slaves, but had lived in states and territories where slavery was illegal, including Illinois and Minnesota (which was then part of the Wisconsin Territory). Dred Scott lost the case when The United States Supreme Court ruled seven to two, on the grounds that he, nor any person of African ancestry, could claim citizenship in the United States, and that therefore Scott could not bring suit in federal court under diversity of citizenship rules.
The Dred Scott Decision, which essentially said the government did not have the right to interfere in where a slave owner took his slave, whether it was free territory or not, took place in Missouri. It denied the Missouri Compromise was legal and that blacks were citizens. It really didn't even define them as human beings, calling them property instead.
The ruling in the Dred Scott case allowed slave owners to take their slaves with them into the Western territories of the United States.
The Dred Scott decision ruled that slaves were not citizens of the United states. Instead, they were the property of their masters. Therefore, a slave owner was within his rights to take a slave with him, even to free states.
the owner didnt take him there his owner died and he fled. his name is Dred Scott and he lost the dred Scott case.