World war 1
Trench warfare made the movement of troops difficult
The trench coat was made as an alternative to the great coat worn by French and British soldiers in WW1. Thomas Burberry made the first trench coat in 1920.
New and improved guns and artillery caused more casualties. Poison gas terrified soldiers. ... The Eastern front shifted over more area than the Western front, with less trench warfare and even more casualties.
The development of gas warfare, combined with the gatling gun, contributed to the casualties. The important thing to remember is that trench warfare was still the main combat style. When people used to rush trenches, individual rifles could not hold them back. The invention of the gatling gun made this tactic useless.
It added mobility in force and was a key element in Germany's Blitzkrieg. It made trench warfare obsolete.
Trench warfare, mustard gas
Trench warfare played a limited role in World War II compared to World War I. In World War II, advancements in military technology and tactics, such as tanks and aircraft, made trench warfare less effective. However, there were instances of trench warfare in certain battles, such as the Siege of Leningrad and the Battle of Stalingrad. These instances often resulted in prolonged and bloody battles, impacting the outcome of the conflict by causing heavy casualties and slowing down the progress of the war.
Trench warfare was rarely used on the eastern front during World War I because the terrain was more open and less suitable for digging extensive trench systems. The vast distances and fluid nature of the fighting on the eastern front also made it difficult to establish static trench lines.
Trench warfare developed on the Western Front during World War I due to the stalemate between the Allied and Central Powers, with both sides digging trenches for protection. On the Eastern Front, the vast open spaces and more fluid military tactics made trench warfare less practical.
trench warfare was very rare during world war 2 and if any trenches were made it was to house MG crews
Trench warfare was ineffective during World War I because it led to a stalemate, with neither side able to make significant advances. The static nature of trench warfare made it difficult to gain ground and resulted in high casualties without achieving decisive victories. Additionally, the conditions in the trenches were harsh, with soldiers facing disease, poor sanitation, and constant danger from enemy attacks.
Trench Warfare, tanks, and improved firearms. Essentially, it was non-napoleonic warfare.
During World War I, yet true for any military conflict involved trenches, soldiers survived the trench-warfare conditions through a variety of means. Above all, they kept their heads down; that is, they made use of their below-ground position to avoid enemy bullets.
the characteristics of the trench warfare were that each so called "team" had faught the war from a trench that they had dug at the battle field. this had made it harder to kill people on the opposing side.
Trench Warfare. Both sides dug trenches and bombarded the other with shells (mini missile bombs). Occasionally one side would go 'over the top' and attempt to capture the enemy's trench by crossing No Man's Land. This was the area between the two front lines of trenches. This area was littered with bodies and craters made by the shells.
During WWI, in trench warfare, German armies dug holes in the ground that were 6 to 8 ft. tall, and wide enough that 2 soldiers could walk side by side at the same time! Trench warfare was fought by one group of soldiers advancing across no mans land to assault the enemy trench quickly, before returning to their trench to apply defensive fire on the enemy, who has retaliated by assaulting their trench. Then the enemy return once fire has ceased. Then they wait for the next move to be made.