a war of attrition means a slow-moving war which takes place in the trenches. it is trench warfare. neither side leaves their trench and enemies are slowly picked off. the conditions in the trenches were horrible and neither side knew how to deal with trench war fare, therefore the was goes VERY slow.
This is called neutrality.
A stalemate war. Neither side could advance, thus it was a stalemate.
Because neither side was ready. It would take months before the armies were recruited, trained and equipped for operations.
Neither side was prepared for war - there were no big, trained armies. But the strategy suggested by the elderly Union General-in-Chief (The slow 'Anaconda Plan') was actually the most realistic proposal, and in the end the North carried out something very similar.
a war of attrition means a slow-moving war which takes place in the trenches. it is trench warfare. neither side leaves their trench and enemies are slowly picked off. the conditions in the trenches were horrible and neither side knew how to deal with trench war fare, therefore the was goes VERY slow.
neutrality
they did'nt want to start another war
This is called neutrality.
Answer It
"I wish my family wouldn't quarrel all the time." "Why do you quarrel so much with your sister?" "I absolutely hate it when my parents quarrel, as I am the one who has to sort it out." "The quarrel between cattlemen and farmers erupted into a full-scale range war."
fence-sitters
fence-sitters
Because the pre-war Regular Army had been very small, and neither side had an army or a civil service that was ready to mount operations.
A stalemate war. Neither side could advance, thus it was a stalemate.
Neither.
Because neither side was ready. It would take months before the armies were recruited, trained and equipped for operations.