Seminole raids
A nation cannot protect it's economic strength without a equally strong military. Nations of the free world during the cold war that had strong economic strength but weak or no militaries were successful...only because the US military protected them.
balance of power
The non-aggression pact was significant because:The two most powerful nations at the time are a team. They have very strong weapons and a lot of military strength therefore they could destroy a lot.The pact allowed Germany to concentrate their military forces on the Western Front.The pact is later broken by Germany when they invade Russia.
They used Poison gas, we had the creeping barrage.
The US has been the most powerful military nation since WW2 (1945).
In the second century it was the Roman force that was powerful both in their military strength and politically as well.
Spartans are much stronger and rely on their brute strength. On the other hand, Athenians are a much more logic based civilization.
Dionysus
The Economic Strength & the Advancement of Military Weapons.
It is subjective to determine the most powerful continent as power can be measured in various ways such as economy, military strength, influence, etc. However, North America is often considered one of the most powerful continents due to countries like the United States and Canada being major global players in terms of economy, technology, and military strength.
i know the strength their strength is that they are very powerful and they have powerful claws too
Spartans valued military strength, discipline, and self-sacrifice above all else, focused on creating a strong warrior society. Athenians, on the other hand, valued democratic governance, individual freedom, and arts and culture. The Spartans prioritized a militaristic and austere lifestyle, while Athenians emphasized intellectual pursuits, civic engagement, and artistic achievements.
Sparta's military strength was their army, witch was the best in Ancient Greece.
or fight off enemy attack.
The Allies had greater miltary strength and size.
No, its military strength enabled it to play a leading part in the earlier Persian Wars.